This is our Independence Moment.

From defence to clean tech, we choose independence over dependence.

We invest in security, democracy, and dignity – from housing and jobs to AI and energy.

We defend democracy. We protect media freedom. Because truth and trust are Europe's strongest shields.

Europe must fight for its freedom, unity, and future.

Leading, protecting, and delivering.

These are just some of the key battles Europe is fighting 👉 https://europa.eu/!NNWdhF

@EUCommission "Europe must fight for its freedom" as if Europe were a person. Hellooo? WE, THE PEOPLE are Europe, I AM Europe. And if you make #ChatControl mandatory you take a piece of my #freedom away

Hello @ranx!
Let us be clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as “chat control”.

Only material that is clearly child sexual abuse will be searched for and can be detected.

Detection orders can only be issued by judicial or independent administrative authorities at the end of a thorough process to assess necessity and proportionality, balancing all the fundamental rights at stake.

@EUCommission @ranx wdym "can be detected"? there's no ai model with 100% accuracy, and for the subject in question, there doesn't even seem to be one with 50% accuracy.

@ww @EUCommission @ranx

Only material that is clearly child sexual abuse

Maybe this is meant as known material? In that case, you can e.g. calculate a hash value.

"clearly"? That sounds like magic unicorn technology.

@wakame @EUCommission @ranx well, the current proposal explicitly includes scanning for unknown material using ai
Chat Control: The EU's CSAM scanner proposal

🇫🇷 French: Traduction du dossier Chat Control 2.0, stopchatcontrol.fr🇸🇪 Swedish: Chat Control 2.0🇩🇰 Danish: chatcontrol.dk🇳🇱 Dutch: Chatcontrole Table of contents: The End of the Privacy of Digital Correspondence and the End of Anonymous Communication Take action to stop Chat

Patrick Breyer

@ww @ranx
@EUCommission

That's why I asked for clarification.

Maybe they are misinformed. Maybe they are bad with words. Maybe they even have a relaxed relationship with the truth.

@wakame @ranx @EUCommission i'm curious which one it is, but i think they pick the posts to reply to with a dice roll, so we'll probably never find out