@meganL @darkuncle @ai6yr Here is a fun article on the history of garment size standardization, and why modern sizing is so unreliable.
(I have a facsimile copy of Alcega's pattern book, with translations.)
https://medium.com/sizolution/a-brief-history-of-sizing-systems-aee6bd066834
@ai6yr @wb2ifs @meganL @darkuncle And there are few alternatives for "talls," as well.
(See: no Viking sizes.)
@wb2ifs @meganL @darkuncle @ai6yr No, the samples used to create sizing "standards" have always been those of "northern European" ancestry; which omits all indigenous people, those from the global South, and even Nordic countries*. It is silly, and totally racist.
*As far as I know, there are no "Viking" sized clothing lines, either.
@ai6yr @wb2ifs @meganL @darkuncle
"Viking size:" 4+" taller than average, long legs and arms, extra broad shoulders, "slab sided" (not much waist, any gender).
Clothing should allow movement, including, but not exclusively, oar walking.