Cracker Barrel will go back to old logo after conservative backlash
Cracker Barrel will go back to old logo after conservative backlash
Some people out there are really reluctant to branch out and try anything different. There’s a million places around me selling the same food but better, but some people just want to go to cracker barrel.
Old people especially, but also some people with, for example, autism, ARFID, etc. can be really picky about where they’ll eat, and sometimes it’s just not worth the aggravation of trying to get them to try something new.
Hell, I have some friends who aren’t even particularly picky who can be reluctant to try out new places. Restaurants aren’t cheap, I can understand being reluctant to spend money on food you’re not sure you’re going to like.
Restaurants aren’t cheap, I can understand being reluctant to spend money on food you’re not sure you’re going to like.
That and sometimes you have to go to the same restaurant a few times until you find the dishes that are good there…
I think I went there twice before they shut down here. I mean, it wasn’t AWFUL. I’d rather eat at a local place though.
www.pignpancake.com/our-story.html
I only learned about it when I saw headlines about the backlash that was costing them millions.
My first reaction after figuring out it was not the Onion was…are they still in business? I honestly didn’t know they were still operating. I looked on the map in the Denver area and the one I thought was in Littleton/Lakewood area either is a figment of my imagination, or they closed.
I don’t think that the old logo is great either, and the update did improve on technical aspects. You don’t want to have all that small text, for example. And generally, simpler logos are preferable.
But…their shtick is a rustic feel. Whatever you can say about the original logo, it did evoke that. I have a hard time seeing the new one doing that.
EDIT: I also think that this compares favorably to another controversial recent rebrand: Musk rebranding Twitter, which was generally seen as not a good idea; Twitter already had a strong brand identity. People weren’t happy and Musk went right ahead with it regardless. At Cracker Barrel, the initial response was “calm down, it’ll be okay”, but they were willing to second-guess themselves, even though I expect that there were people there who were invested in the rebrand.
EDIT2: They’d also done smaller, more incremental changes to the logo in the past, because the “Old Country Store” text had had its typeface changed at some point in the past.
EDIT3: Here’s a more-comprehensive history:
How was it awful?
Could you tell me what the heck this yellow blob shape is supposed to be?
From a purely graphic design perspective, the classic logo is too busy and doesn’t scale well. The only thing it has going for it is the weirdness of the shape and the distinct color combination. It’s technically a really bad logo. You may not prefer the new logo but, technically, it’s a whole lot better. It’s far more adaptable to newer platforms while stilling being recognizable. Now, as far as being an effective representation of the brand and if that’s a corporate concern, I don’t know that I can comment on that.
In another post about this, someone posted a bunch of other fast food logos, and they all looked very much the same, especially in silhouette. They’re all just a same-y blend of mediocrity, whereas the existing logo was at least unique.
McDonald’s probably has the best and most distinctive logo out of anyone.
Jaguar was less about the logo and more about that whole marketing campaign. It was like they were doing a cologne commercial and left out the car completely. The logo change was the least of it.
When we did finally see the car, it looked like an AI generated concept, not an actual car. :(
The new logo did not go over well in some spheres, and on social media, conservative critics accused the restaurant chain of abandoning its traditional values or of being "woke."
When someone uses the word ‘woke’ as an unironic insult, I’ll probably think it’s stupid, but at least I understand what they’re saying. Until now, that is. What the fuck is “woke” supposed to mean in this context? What makes this bland logo change “woke”?
I thought the same thing when I first saw the headlines about them losing millions over a logo change. The mind reels.
The occult community often compares sigils and corporate logos as being very much the same thing, but…DAMN. That’s one hell of a spell that was cast over a whole lotta dumbfucks.
I frequent various chains, and I’m trying to think about the last time I really gave one fuck about any of their logos. I’m sure some of it works on a more subliminal and pernicious level, but have I ever sat back and really gave myself heartburn over a corporate logo? Hell to the fuck no.
Good luck with that. The explaining part, I mean.
I’ve had xtians hound me on various forums for using their own abbreviation, LOL. Even after explaining it to them, they’d still get worked up into a poutrage, deny what I told them, which was obviously true, and, at least on Denver Post forums, run to the mods to try to get me banned and/or my posts taken down.