@funkylab @hennichodernich @tnt @securelyfitz Ok that makes sense. So what you are saying is that there needs to be "someone" to build a "proper" PCIe SDR that can compete with Ettus offerings. If I understand correctly Ettus makes cool stuff but it is quite pricy and closed source. I did hear about the driver issues and lack of support in other solutions in the PCIe SDR segment.
So I hope our foundational work to unlock PCIe a bit more will be useful here. This is big part of the campaign.
@esden @funkylab @hennichodernich @securelyfitz
The HW is not open, although usually schematics are available as PDF, just not design files.
Gateware and Software is open.
Thing is for SDR, the "hardware" is the easy part. Good driver stack and proper support in the various frameworks and application (continued through the _years_ !) is an order of magniture harder and costlier. And "crowdfunded" hw never account for that ... and so end up with crappy sw.
@tnt @funkylab @hennichodernich @securelyfitz Ahh ok. Sorry to misrepresent things in that case. Even then, it is good to have more than one option.
As for HW vs SW/GW: I 100% agree... the hardware often the easy part, the hard and very expensive part is the software... open source volunteering is rarely enough... think Black Magic Debug… :D
@funkylab @f4grx @esden @tnt @securelyfitz Pavel Demin is currently designing a 10GbE version of the Red Pitaya with doubled bandwidth, I would prefer a PCIe device.
I could use a bit more bandwidth for my 8ch 80MSps receiver...
@brouhaha @hennichodernich @esden @tnt @securelyfitz
> * next generation SDR chip
I mean, the AD9371 is out there to play around with. Reference schematics of working products do exist, e.g. https://kb.ettus.com/images/9/9d/USRP_N310_N300_DB_Schematic.pdf