Florencia (she/her)Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
hooferboofarchive.is/QTpGe because its either pay walled or needs an account
thanks
The real hero
Gross.
Sometime make it do this to Trump so that we can summon a lawsuit ouroboros
UlrichYou may not have noticed there was a nude AI deepfake of Trump that’s been viewed tens of millions of times, aired on Comedy Central.
That’s satire though.
Under any reasonable (big caveat for American courts right now) that’s free speech.
And under any court at all, so is this. That’s the problem.
I disagree here, but I’m not a lawyer
Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?
I disagree that Grok appears as any form of satire here
No one said it was. What I said was that it doesn’t matter if it’s satire or not, it’s still classified as free speech, until a court proves otherwise.
SnausagesinaBlanketI have no clue and barely remembered the law being passed.
Under what law?
[Take it down act](On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including “digital forgeries” (i.e., deepfakes), in certain circumstances.)
Hmm, interesting, thanks. Has anyone been charged or convicted with this law yet?
Definitely not convicted. That’d be some crazy speed.
However, your insistence that it hasn’t happened yet so can’t happen is insane. There has to be a first case in which it hadn’t happened before.
your insistence that it hasn’t happened yet so can’t happen is insane
It would be insane if that was what I had insisted, but that didn’t happen. You just made it up.
Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?
Then you’re provided a law where it’d be illegal:
Hmm, interesting, thanks. Has anyone been charged or convicted with this law yet?
This seems to heavily imply you don’t believe it’s illegal until someone’s been convicted.
It doesn’t imply that at all.
Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?
I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation
you will have to directly regulate image generation
Its already being done to help prevent fake CSAM.
That should have been standard from the start.
LucidlethargyI don’t think anyone has any delusions that Twitter is private, not even DM’s.
It absolutely is private insofar as it is a channel between the software running on their end -> user who is operating the software. The lack of end to end encryption does not make it not private it makes it insecure which doesn’t speak whatsoever to the issue raised which is that creation of an image by a user isn’t likely to be considered publication until they share it.
It’s highly probable that keeping people from generating deep fake nudes requires additional law.
Uhm, there have been plenty of cases of people getting in trouble for sharing deepfake porn yes. It’s sexual harassment.
Well, at least over here in Europe, and it’s mostly been with teenagers, I don’t know the situation on the US
But generally, making and sharing porn of real people is… well… that can very easily count as sexual harassement
how can an ai bot pull a free speech defense? free speech is, ostensibly, reserved for people…?
Are you under the impression that the AI bot was not created by people?
So? The manufacturer of the product is not responsible for how people use the product. Otherwise there would be no gun manufacturers anymore.
They are, however, responsible if the product they created does illegal things.
Well no, that was a practical effect.
TheFANUM Only it was mostly real
Not anymore real than these photos from Grok.
greenfiredeep fake of a deep fake president?
what’s the poimt?
Taylor swift nude gross, but trump nude good? You have rare taste it seems.
I mean, all the AI deepfake nudes are gross, but I’m interested in the chaos and two awful people getting in a fight.
That’s not what they said at all. They said they want two bass with two lawsuits coming from every side of the political spectrum.
Hell yeah. That’s awesome.
With a white supremacist at its helm
Honestly from my understanding, Tay is pretty badly misrepresented. The headlines basically went as if read twitter posts, and the overwhelming negative content on it lead the algorythm to make it say really horrible stuff.
But the actuality of it was dumber, the AI side of it to my knowledge never said anything offensive. They gave the damn thing a “Say” command. which basically the trolls learned in 2 seconds and instructed it to repeat racist things.
paraphrandYup. Everything negative it said was intentionally triggered by a troll.
Now if one were to suggest everything negative Grok has said was also triggered by a troll named Elon Musk, well…
Jokes aside. They are very different situations and have very different implications for society.
“… for science” - reporter
I mean I get what you are saying, but at the same time this does need attempting with every image generation AI and reporting on if successful. If this capability existed but wasn’t general knowledge it calls cause serious issues.
Better that it’s made public so that the information is in the public consciousness.
So everyone is naked and without job. What would be next AI revolution ?
Binetteeveryday I thank myself for being too shut-in to post pictures of myself online
Just block all men from your life and you’ll be fine 🤣❤️ tried and trusted method
femcel maxxing
It’s so dumb to take the word incel and turn it around because incels actually want to sleep with women and get mad that they cant. " Femcels" do not wanna be near men and wanna delete them off the planet lol so I don’t get it?
Who said incel? You can also be a female volcel,
You sound like the sort of person who’s made a Facebook post along the lines of “If you can’t handle me at my worst…”
Aaah yes right next to, I need a man in my life to make me whole, I need 10 kids to fill this empty void in my heart. I want that tradwife life where I have a full time wfh job, cook, clean and do all the child minding like a good lil slave and at the end of the day when he comes home, I give him the good ole skull vacuum service 💀 BEFORE HE TAKES A SHOWER. Sounds like heaven!
You sound like a fun person to be around…
Why because I don’t let anyone infiltrate my skull?
No because you’ve made that your entire personality
Don’t get mad at me because you’ve decided to be angry about something that isn’t happening. How many women do you know who have 10 kids, how many men do you know would want to have 10 kids? That is no one’s fantasy.
If you want to make being the victim your whole identity that’s fine but the rest of the world doesn’t need to hear about it.
My grandma had 11 kids.
Congrats, that’s 1 out of how many people do you know?
Hopefully not many
Haha gender discrimination is so cute and quirky.
It is if the extent of your personality is limited to whining about how “all men are pigs” on Facebook. It loses it’s impact after the 15th time they do it.
So you’re saying the first 14 times were successful hence the b4 movement
This user is a pedophile btw ^