Florencia (she/her)Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
panda_abyssGross.
Sometime make it do this to Trump so that we can summon a lawsuit ouroboros
UlrichYou may not have noticed there was a nude AI deepfake of Trump that’s been viewed tens of millions of times, aired on Comedy Central.
That’s satire though.
Under any reasonable (big caveat for American courts right now) that’s free speech.
And under any court at all, so is this. That’s the problem.
I disagree here, but I’m not a lawyer
Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?
SnausagesinaBlanketUnder what law?
[Take it down act](On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including “digital forgeries” (i.e., deepfakes), in certain circumstances.)
Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?
I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation
LucidlethargyI don’t think anyone has any delusions that Twitter is private, not even DM’s.
It absolutely is private insofar as it is a channel between the software running on their end -> user who is operating the software. The lack of end to end encryption does not make it not private it makes it insecure which doesn’t speak whatsoever to the issue raised which is that creation of an image by a user isn’t likely to be considered publication until they share it.
It’s highly probable that keeping people from generating deep fake nudes requires additional law.