Met my MSc dissertation students this week. All good natured people. But the genAI rot is spreading.

About half of them do their work, and ask me questions about the problems they encounter. I advise on possible next steps. We meet again next week. All good.

But.

The other half, each of them perfectly well meaning, came back to me with questions that had nothing to do with their projects, and proposed solutions that are alien to the framework we are using. After some serious conversations, I found that in each case they had relied on chatGTP answers to their prompts. They had not read the actual papers I had given them.

Some had implemented equations that are patently false, not by error (this would be good for learning), but because chatGPT told them so.

A significant part our students can't read anymore. They need to interact with genAI, and they think this is research.

We are heading for trouble. In higher education, and in society at large.

#noAI #AcademicChatter

@the_roamer With all due respect, but any student incapable or unwilling to read, understand and critique papers is unfit to earn the degree that they are after.

The minimum I expect from university graduates is the ability to find, assess and use information appropriately. To identify the skills needed to solve a problem and acquire them. Not parrot an llm without an ounce of critical thinking or mental effort. In the end, this is technology fueled copycat behaviour.

@kgndiue

"With all due respect ...", please explain, which of my points are you disagreeing with?

@the_roamer more directed towards the students than you. I do not disagree with anything you said.

@kgndiue

They don't know any better. It's a cultural maelstrom.