"Parasitariat" describes the new Government very well.
-------
In response to clarification from @yora, who should be thanked for this new terminology, I want to clarify. "Parasitariat" means the "billionaire scum elite". I used the term for a subset, the current US Government, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the billionaire scum elite. But the parasitariat is bigger than merely the Government.
Right on! I meant the Government that is the wholly-owned subsidiary of the billionaire scum elite.
@oldclumsy_nowmad @yora @markstoneman
Oh....This is very, very, very bad....had plans to conduct research later this summer. Am I screwed?
@thegardendude @markstoneman
That said, i can't find anything about this on the site there
Edit: i see other sources linking to the same page with the same note in other places. I just don't see that note on the page they reference. Maybe it was removed?
We hold permanent records created by Federal agencies that include: Textual records from civilian agencies Army unit records dating from WW1 Navy unit records dating from WW2 Still pictures Electronic records Cartographic and architectural holdings Motion picture, sound, and video records JFK Assassination Records Berlin Documents Center microfilm Highlights from Our Holdings Moving Images and Sound Photographs and Graphic Works Textual Records Location and Hours Enlarge Directions to 8601 Adelphi Rd.
Locking away from the poors
And the Archives location at College Park (under discussion here) has a lot of World War-era unit records, and general A/V resources. Plus the entire JFK Assassination files.
An independent author researcher? An independent researcher working on what they hope is their first book? Or only researchers affiliated with recognized entities? (I'm' gonna be p*ssed if Liberty University, etc. make the cut.)
@markstoneman It's very disturbing. I suspect the restriction is deliberately worded in such a way that authorities can define "legitimate business need" on the fly.
It's whatever they claim is legitimate at the moment. If you're research is a problem to them, it's not legitimate.
If anybody's got time, maybe they could develop some kind of legitimate business need before it closes to them, so you can monitor what's happening.
I'm checking my own local National Archives site....
My NARA is the Southeast Regional in Morrow, Georgia.
Which *literally* shares a parking lot with the Georgia State Archives, which years ago was in the news because the GA Secretary of State (Brian Kemp, currently governor) tried to close that state archives because it didn't generate enough income to pay its own operating expenses ... much less a profit.
It's the Republicans.
Agree completely.
I expect that they're trying to change the past by mutilating the contents of the National Archives there.
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
@markstoneman While the current regime said that breaking into a restricted access federal facility with weapons, is a perfectly activity for tourists
"As the National Archives at College Park continues into its third decade of existence, the facility accommodates more than 22,000 annual research requests from nearly 48,000 visitors."
This page was last reviewed on March 27, 2024.
#USNationalArchives #CollegePark #RecordsAccess
@histodons @geneadons
The National Archives at College Park is a 1.8-million-square-foot facility located just outside of Washington, DC, in College Park, MD. Opened in 1994 near the campus of the University of Maryland, the building serves as additional space for the preservation of historically significant documents and artifacts of the United States. The College Park location, informally known as Archives II, offers the opportunity to continue housing federal records in the Washington Metro area. Born out of a longstanding need for more archival space, the building is intended to last for generations.
This has to go to SCOTUS and as crooked as most of them are, I think this will cross a line with the majority of them.
"O'Brien was looking down at him speculatively. More than ever he had the air of a teacher taking pains with a wayward but promising child.
'There is a Party slogan dealing with the control of the past,' he said. 'Repeat it, if you please.'
"Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past," repeated Winston obediently.
"Who controls the present controls the past," said O'Brien, nodding his head with slow approval. 'Is it your opinion, Winston, that the past has real existence?'
Again the feeling of helplessness descended upon Winston. His eyes flitted towards the dial. He not only did not know whether 'yes' or 'no' was the answer that would save him from pain; he did not even know which answer he believed to be the true one.
O'Brien smiled faintly. 'You are no metaphysician, Winston,' he said. 'Until this moment you had never considered what is meant by existence. I will put it more precisely. Does the past exist concretely, in space? Is there somewhere or other a place, a world of solid objects, where the past is still happening?'
'No.'
'Then where does the past exist, if at all?'
'In records. It is written down.'
'In records. And- ?'
'In the mind. In human memories.
'In memory. Very well, then. We, the Party, control all records, and we control all memories. Then we control the past, do we not?'
'But how can you stop people remembering things?' cried Winston again momentarily forgetting the dial. 'It is involuntary. It is outside oneself. How can you control memory? You have not controlled mine!'
O'Brien's manner grew stern again. He laid his hand on the dial."
@markstoneman i checked this yesterday, then pointed it out to the congresshuman whose district that is.
I'd be OK if they just came out and said, "melon husk fucked up our budget and fired everybody," but an email to inquire@nara.gov gets a shit robomail with no information.
If trumpys will be deciding what the undefined "legitimate business need" is, I'm all in favor of breaking the door down and fracturing a few testicles.
@markstoneman This seems to be a violation of the 14th Amendment's requirement of Equal Protection.
Here is a situation in which businesses and people are given different treatment.
(And the right that people are exercising can include 1st Amendment rights to accumulate information for a petition.)
So this would seem to be a change that requires quite strict scrutiny. Yet the maga-klan has not presented any reasoning, much less one that is both compelling enough to overcome strict scrutiny and also to be the least burdensome method.