@Eh__tweet @disisdeguey @Strandjunker
It was as brutal under Biden, you just refused to see it.
@Eh__tweet @disisdeguey @Strandjunker
What's the point of not participating in a vote between two genocidal candidates? Is that seriously your question?
Neoliberals hit the furthest extent that they could push us all to the far right, and that point was literal fucking genocide. You need to adjust your blame, the Harris campaign had a very easy way to avoid all this. They thought they could force us all to vote for her with the threat of Trump. Well, they can't. Learn the fucking lesson.
@Eh__tweet @disisdeguey @Strandjunker
The genocide was running at full speed under Biden, what we're seeing now is no different from what was happening, it would've progressed along the same path.
Again, maybe the Harris campaign should've considered whether defending the depravity of a far right foreign regime was worth throwing our democracy down the drain.
I completely disagree that genocide apologetics deserve respect, no matter how much respectable language they're wrapped up in.
@contrasocial @disisdeguey @Strandjunker
You are talking about what the Dems should have or should have not done. I don't argue on that, and the Dems are accountable for their choices.
I am talking about voters. Also they are accountable for the consequences of their choices.
The life of a guy deported to a concentration camp in El Salvador is not more worth that a Palestinian, but also not less worth.
And choosing "the lesser evil" does not mean being a genocide apologetic.
@Eh__tweet @disisdeguey @Strandjunker
There is no "lesser evil" with genocide. Just evil.
And yes, voters are responsible for their votes. Which includes the last 40 years of "lesser" evil voting that got us here.
Those who withheld their votes are the very people effected by that choice. They made it willingly, despite it putting us in danger.
This is the end of the lesser evil strategy ever being viable. It's critical that you accept that. Do not try to force through another AIPAC dem.
And what would have been the result had she strongly come out against Israel?
Sadly, the point of running for president is to WIN or try to, in order to get in a place what you can affect change.
If she'd won, could she have stopped Israel? Probably not, but they haven't been stopped in the current outcome, either.
And the US is worse off for it. (Yes, coldly, sometimes we have to think about more than one terrible thing at a time.)
Just one opinion, all my own, trying to make sense of things.
@Eh__tweet @contrasocial @disisdeguey @Strandjunker You nailed it. The people who didn’t vote are making excuses for themselves now.
The “both sides are bad” people are helping MAGA. They might never gain the self-awareness to see it. But they are.