One of my constraints around ‘places to live’ is, I have never, not once in my life lived somewhere where I need to ‘get into a private vehicle and travel somewhere else to food or things’. I’ve always lived in ultra dense big cities (SF being the smallest one), and so that sort of walkable or bus or train type situation, going round the corner in my pajamas to get galangal, or to to the fishmonger, instead of big box stores and cars, is just broadly what I prefer. And there aren’t that many places to live like that this side of the world
I think I would be extremely depressed if I changed that
I couldn’t even walk 10 steps of my house yesterday without my neighbor forcing me to take a giant ‘zongzi’ (Chinese rice ‘tamale’ eaten for some special occasions)
I also got fed homemade soy milk so I’m happy
@skinnylatte
There is definitely a lot of suburban wasteland, and I think the US is worse.
But it doesn't have to be that way. Where we live now there are multiple ethnic grocery stores (Polish, Turkish, Suriname, Asian "toko", etc), all within walking distance or a few minutes in a bus in nearby shopping areas.
And downtown is about 15 minutes away by bus.
It isn't a giant cosmopolitan metropolis though, fewer folks will feed you
@skinnylatte
Primary school for our son was 5 minutes walking, crossing 1 minor street. So is the doctor's office. Now he cycles to secondary school in 15 minutes.
5 minutes cycling away is my allotment garden plot where me, fruit, flowers, veggies and weeds hang out.
5 minutes walking are various wooded areas, as the woods come into the city at this point. There's a petting zoo there. You can also go in another direction, walk or cycle by a canal.
@skinnylatte long term I'd like to settle in a village that's not that far from a larger town/city and has decent bus/train connections.
There are some draw backs like not being able to go to a food place on a whim.
But cities tend to be too lound and too busy and I need to go cycling up the hill on a forest maintenance route to recenter myself and calm down. Tartu is an exception.
From my perspective there are a few baked-in assumptions here:
Living in a city with the noise and smells is not itself physically (sensorily) painful.
You can afford to live in the city. (Rent/mortgage, utilities, transportation, et cetera.)
You can afford to buy delicious things in the city.
You socialize well enough with people that they want to feed you delicious things.
If you start unticking those boxes then it eventually may become a set of competing unhappinesses where you chose the least worst option.
@zygmyd all true in the N American context, but i basically grew up in a city state and never had any other way of life available to me, even if all of those things were not true.
i'm learning now about different ways of living, i'm glad they exist, but also, i am still deeply comforted by cities. and in this context, it's because they tend to be the only places that provide me with the cultural affinity i am after, vs being a complete outsider in places with far less diversity.
it's a reasonable cost for me, one that would take a lot to give up.
I have myself tried country, city, and suburban living and city living by far suits me. Likewise, it would take a lot for me to give this up.
@skinnylatte For me the fantasy is being away from people means never hurting or disappointing them or being judged for being too emotional or doing things your own way, or not wanting to eat something unfamiliar or you didn't like. As long as I could have a cat for company... It can eat me when I die, and nobody would have to know or miss me (though ideally my theoretical cat will be found before any harm comes to it, so I'd almost be willing to jsut not have a cat)
It took me years to learnt o stop automatically and ceaselessly smiling around people to not give the impression I was angry or discontent (and so I wouldn't get in trouble for not looking happy and pleasant).
Y'know, trauma.