I am growing tired of governments who can't seem to understand how encryption works.

You *cannot* both have secure encryption and encryption with a backdoor (or "lawful" access). It's impossible.

https://www.privacyguides.org/articles/2025/04/11/encryption-is-not-a-crime/#magical-backdoor-only-for-the-good-guys-is-a-complete-fantasy

#Encryption #E2EE

Encryption Is Not a Crime

Encryption is not a crime, encryption protects all of us. Encryption, and especially end-to-end encryption, is an essential tool to protect everyone online. Attempts to undermine encryption are an attack to our fundamental right to privacy and an attack to our inherent right to security and safety.

Privacy Guides
@Em0nM4stodon I tried to tell someone this before, (albeit not very well), and got blocked. Some people just don't want to understand or learn, and I doubt the people who benefit from this will.
@Em0nM4stodon I'm sure they understand the issue and just act willfully ignorant at this point honestly
@Em0nM4stodon erm..just to clarify, do you mean the same one that was thinking about "hacking back"?
@Em0nM4stodon Technical solution is similar to sending an encrypted email to multiple recipients: encrypt message with symetric key, encrypt symmetric key: once with intended recipient public key, store it. Encrypt with "lawful interception" public key, store it. Question is, who will get access to backdoor private key besides police.
And of course it defeats the purpose of encryption.

@Em0nM4stodon

We should tell them that one of the key components would be bullets that only kill bad guys.

@Em0nM4stodon I think they understand full well. They just say the bit about security not to spook the majority of the population.

@Em0nM4stodon You can have encryption with backdoor access though. It just won't be secure.

What these people don't understand is why the 'secure' part is important.

To be honest, how do you explain that in an effective way? Especially if you barely get a sentence to do that pitch.

@loke Reading the linked article might help

@Em0nM4stodon Absolutely, but the people who push for these legislations are not going to read that article.

They are going to ask: 'can we add a backdoor to this?', and the answer is either: 'technically yes, but it won't be secure', which is the correct answer but they will only hear the 'yes' part.

Or, you can answer 'no, it's not possible'. But that answer doesn't capture exactly what it is that is impossible, and they'll just go to someone who can tell them 'yes'.

The Expert (Short Comedy Sketch)

Subscribe for more short comedy sketches & films: http://bit.ly/laurisb Buy Expert shirts & hoodies at https://laurisb.myshopify.com/ Funny business meeting ...

YouTube
@Em0nM4stodon
You can have either doors or curtains.
@Em0nM4stodon didn't we decide this back in the 1990s with the clipper chip?
@ianturton @Em0nM4stodon this (privacy), like any other human right, is not given (once it is even achieved). Instead, coming from an experience of rights enjoyment makes it *harder* to be conscious of its importance and of the need to actively defend it. Eventually it's easier to have it stolen.
@Em0nM4stodon I'm growing tired of governments not understanding pretty much anything. Government and Dunning-Kruger are almost synonymous now.
@Em0nM4stodon They're not ignorant. They just want it broken.
@Em0nM4stodon can't wait until it is made a crime. Not gonna stop me tho
@Em0nM4stodon reminds me of "We wanna make sure that you are secure in our hands"