I’m great at LinkedIn:
«It’s fascinating to see how folks who were still in primary school when I was working on a browser and doing agile, are showing up with their No True Scotsman. I’ve been building products for 20 years. I have programmed professionally in everything from assembly to typescript for 20 years. I had run retrospectives for years before Obama was elected president. Y’all Agile mansplainers need to take a chill pill 😘»
This whole Agile Coach debacle has helped me realize something that hadn’t fully landed with me before: agile started as a movement driven by builders to «build better», but it is largely dominated now with people who don’t know how to build and look at agile as a management process style. These are MBA-like folks who are trying to figure out how to manage an IT organization. But that wasn’t what agile was about. It was about a better way to build stuff, better stuff, by collaboration and not getting stuck in our ways. | 131 comments on LinkedIn
@turid I have 2 theories:
1. They are not used to dealing with criticism they can’t reject out of hand. I have deeper and longer industry experience than most of them. They also have no power over me. This is not something they’re used to.
2. Deep inside they know the emperor has no clothes, but not knowing (even actively promoting it) is the basis of their paychecks.
Maybe both? Maybe something else? It’s definitely interesting to observe.