From @garymarcus on BlueSky:
A computer scientist’s perspective on vibe coding:
From @garymarcus on BlueSky:
A computer scientist’s perspective on vibe coding:
@bsletten @garymarcus @ericsedge strong disagree that many of those examples qualify as equivalent to vibe coding.
To me, this is an elitist view of what qualifies as “real” coding being equated with getting a computer to make shit up.
Of the tools listed which I have used, *none* are the same as LLM or vibe coding.
We should do better, and stop gatekeeping on real people solving real issues with the tools that allow them to code.
ChatGPT, Copilot, etc. do not teach *any* coding principles in the way those tools do, and it’s beneath any sensible person to suggest there is an equivalence here.
0/10 (rating, not thread post count)
@europlus @bsletten @garymarcus
A better, and still weak example, might be paired programming with a very junior developer with great memory and little experience. The current level of LLM competency is more akin to “maybe try this?” rather than the performance I expect from human.
I’ve been experimenting a bit with vibe coding and have found it somewhat useful if my expectations are set properly.
2/2