“The Hitler tariffs, announced on Friday, February 10, 1933, stunned observers. “The dimension of the tariff increases have in fact exceeded all expectations,” the Vossische Zeitung wrote disapprovingly, proclaiming the moment a “fork in the road” for the German economy. It appeared that Europe’s largest and most industrialized nation would suddenly be returning “to the furrow and the plow.” The New York Times saw this for what it was: “a trade war” against its European neighbors.
@georgetakei I'm drinking a lovely cup of Tetley's #tea. Very good tea. Very cheap tea from the #UK. Why not American Freedom tea? Because freedom tea tastes like whore cooch. It takes several hundred years of cultivation to produce a good tea and a thriving tea estate. And no matter how patriotic you are...the tea is not going to be better faster because of "america first". We can't get EVERYTHING domestically. It's impossible. #economy

@praetor LMAO British colonialism produced Tetley's tea.

You just prefer your flavor of colonialism. At least an Indian corporation eventually bought that particular colonial institution.

How about trying to migrate to transnational business which doesn't begin with colonialism?

Like perhaps an Indian tea producer which was founded by an Indian, who sells the kind of tea I drink, and not that colonialist originated stuff?

https://www.vahdam.com/

VAHDAM® India | Feel Alive : Buy Premium Teas Online

Explore VAHDAM® India, an online tea shop with an extensive range of loose leaf teas from India, tea bags, drinkware, tea gifts & more. Buy premium teas hassle-free.

VAHDAM® USA
@femme_mal And honestly...they ALL started from Colonialism. Every last estate has started that way.

@praetor @femme_mal For Germany, it's more complex. Germany became a coloniser only in the late 1870s for <50 years. What led to Nazism was rather the Versailles treaty, which was the peak of a tit-for-tat French-German escalation since 1804. The Nazis exploited the common sentiment of having been badly treated, blamed the left and Jews as traitors, and campaigned on reversing Versailles.

It was rather Mussolini with his abessinian ventures who wanted to recreate the (Roman) colonial empire.

@DP0 @praetor "Not all colonialists..."

*smh*

We'll just pretend Brandenburgisch-Afrikanische Compagnie c. 1680s never happened.

Or that Germany's expansion between 1100-1400 CE wasn't also colonialism because the affected weren't third world brown people.

@femme_mal @praetor
1. I didn't deny German colonialism. I just disagreed with you on linking the 3rd Reich with colonialism.

2. The "Brandenburgische" was about slave trade, lasted 30 years, and was over 200 years before Hitler's birth. And as despicable as it was, I do not see a connection.

3. Expansionism and colonialism are closely related. However, the latter term is indeed mainly used for European overseas expansion after 1492. I haven't heard people saying the Normans colonised England.