"Apple’s response to the Injunction strains credulity. "

"[Apple] continued its anticompetitive conduct solely to maintain its revenue stream."

"Remarkably, Apple believed that this Court would not see through its obvious cover-up"

And the banger conclusion:

"As always, the coverup made it worse. For this Court, there is no second bite at the apple."

@viticci Personally, I thought the “scare sheet” was always fine, even if a bit heavy handed. Plenty of websites have similar messages when linking out to another site (I.e.: banks and healthcare).

Not only that, but I think it served an important customer service purpose. By proceeding, Apple is no longer responsible (for billing, scams, etc) and would be unable to help resolve any issues.

But because Apple refused to give just an inch, everything gets thrown out.