“Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”

The Posse Comitatus Act was passed after the Civil War for a reason

Any attempt to send federal troops into civilian law enforcement is a speed run toward a police state

@flexghost This is *exactly* what Alex Jones has been shouting would happen from the rooftops for about 25 years. Martial law, police state, posse comitatus. This is like, his whole shtick. Even down to declaring bogus national 'emergencies' to justify it. He warned us.

Except of course, it's his side doing it.

@BonehouseWasps this is an irony that made me laugh out my nose just now
@flexghost @BonehouseWasps Yeah. Where's a well-regulated militia when you need one, eh?
×

“Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”

The Posse Comitatus Act was passed after the Civil War for a reason

Any attempt to send federal troops into civilian law enforcement is a speed run toward a police state

@flexghost And, soldiers will have to choose their loyalty. The US Constitution or #DirtbagDon. At what point will swearing an oath to the Constitution just....go away?
@peteorrall they are firing anyone with integrity or ability and putting a Russian system in place that champions loyalty above all else
@flexghost ...because this will make this country great again. 🤦‍♂️ 🤮

@flexghost

I'm not sure having Nazi Barbie and her pet drunk advise the convicted felon is actually going to convince career military officers to follow illegal orders.

@flexghost Not not good!
@DebC a double negative makes it good which is a total relief

@flexghost

"The Posse Comitatus Act was passed after the Civil War for a reason

Any attempt to send federal troops into civilian law enforcement is a speed run toward a police state"

So

Exactly and with specificity;

Who is going to enforce that?

Trump himself? hahaha

The Federal judiciary? Terrified, emasculated and utterly neutered

Federal law enforcement at any level? Compromised, Quislings, traitors all

Take a deep breath and admit it: it's game over for democracy in the United States of America

@FinchHaven I admitted that a long ass time ago

@flexghost

This is today, and that post of your will have new readers today

@FinchHaven @flexghost Individual states? I can’t imagine that the bluer ones would be thrilled about having their urban centers turned into a literal combat zone.
@flexghost
I hope the more senior field grade and staff officers aren't Fox News initiated.
Their allegiance is to the US Constitution, not the psychiatric institution candidate.

@flexghost

Violence and fear is all they have left after 100 days.

@flexghost This is *exactly* what Alex Jones has been shouting would happen from the rooftops for about 25 years. Martial law, police state, posse comitatus. This is like, his whole shtick. Even down to declaring bogus national 'emergencies' to justify it. He warned us.

Except of course, it's his side doing it.

@BonehouseWasps this is an irony that made me laugh out my nose just now

@flexghost It's grimly comical.

We used to also laugh at the fact that the conspiracy theorists painted their enemies as both criminal masterminds and incompetent buffoons simultaneously. "How could both be true at once?", we chuckled to ourselves, smugly.

And yet, here we are.

@flexghost I know a lot of military folks that will not do this.
@Thumptastic3 I do also but what they tell me about the culture isn’t something that gives me hope
@flexghost That is a valid fear. Imagine, them fighting eachother.

@flexghost

Trump thinks the Posse Comitatus Act is something you do in the bedroom.

@weaselx86 needs more purple needs more gold
@flexghost Yeahbut isn't that what you or I would call a "law", and therefore irrelevant to the Trump junta?
@flexghost
"a speed run toward a police state".
I have some bad "news" from 2019:
the US police spending is the highest in the world, so high that it ranks above every other country's MILITARY spending except China's.
@jbiserkov spending isn’t new and even military equipment isn’t new the power is granted is new
@flexghost I agree 101% that the US is moving towards / is in - a new phase. All I'm saying is that the phrase "police state" doesn't even come close to describing what that new phase is, because the US has been a police state for decades now.
"Military dictatorship"?
"Military occupation"?
"Genocide"?
"Self-coup"?
"Imperial Tomahawk Cruise Missile"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_boomerang
Imperial boomerang - Wikipedia

@flexghost. Two years in jail? I'd say go for the electric chair.
@hans do you want to know what the punishment for an attempted coup and insurrection is? You get elected president with even more power
@flexghost. This time it worked out like this, yes. Had he been on the chair on Jan 7, he would never have been reelected 😉
@flexghost I doubt trump gives a dam.
@flexghost I don't understand how the people and Congress can remain peaceful.
@Blanco complicit or powerless
@flexghost The people powerless, Congress complicit. We have plenty of examples in history, but history and geography are not the strength of the white US population.

@flexghost

"There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state. The other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people." - William Adama

@ClipHead @flexghost

in most states the cops aren't even defined as to serve "the people" but to uphold public order or to protect private property.

this distinction is not only theoretical.

@flexghost

> There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.

https://www.quotes.net/show-quote/7877

Adama: There's a reason you separate military and the police. One fights the enemies of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.

A great memorable quote from the Battlestar Galactica, Season 1 show on Quotes.net

@flexghost It was more powerful to me when I saw it around when it originally aired. Now I see the "serve and protect" bit in there, and am reminded that even it contains copaganda.

The police are under no duty to serve or protect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAfUI_hETy0

Why The Cops Won't Help You When You're Getting Stabbed

YouTube
@flexghost That's OK, the USA has private paramilitary corps out the wazoo.
@flexghost
Now it's war....🤬

@flexghost

I literally believe that he is the man of lawlessness (no, not in the Biblical sense of the word, although …).

@flexghost

George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, militarized #police used in Ferguson and at Columbia, ICE metastasized by Obama from a modest number of cop “multipliers” under Dubya and then bolstered by Peter Thiel’s Palantir.

There is no running toward a police state when it was already here.

@flexghost Each State has its own National Guard for the same reasons.

@overunderlay

state National Guards are under governor control unless federalized

That’s the point

Using federal troops or federalized Guard for policing without Congressional or constitutional authority is still barred by the Posse Comitatus Act.

@flexghost Bondi and Hegseth won't have to look any further back than the September 2024 directive of the Biden Pentagon, DoD 5240.01

the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also
includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.

https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/524001p.PDF?ver=UpTwJ66AyyBgvy7wFyTGbA%3d%3d

@unfinishedsymphony

Claiming Biden "did it first" is laughable. DoD 5240.01 only allows intel support “when lives are in danger” and with strict approval.

It even warns “All support... where a confrontation... is reasonably anticipated” must go through the Secretary of Defense

Just worry about your puce text.