That piece of writing I was talking about finishing that I was equally proud of and scared to post because I love it? Here it is.

I am starting a new project, it is A Newsletter, and it is About Tech, but it is a very different tech newsletter.

Welcome to Fight for the Human. Sign up to start setting your compass toward rehumanization.

https://www.fightforthehuman.com/why-i-cannot-be-technical/

Why I Cannot Be Technical

With some regularity, kind-hearted Technical people tell me that I Can Be Technical, Too. This usually happens when I’m asking us to define what we’re calling technical in a software environment. I understand why it happens. I am a psychologist of software environments and that is something of

Fight for the Human
@grimalkina SUBSCRIBED, at the free level for now but I will upgrade that when I'm able to do so. No chance for a "pay what you're able" tier or a "pay for someone else to receive" tier?
@trishalynn oh totally! I think there is a "tip" option I can set up once I figure it out πŸ™ˆ love the idea of a gift subscription!! will try to figure that out too!
@trishalynn (but also please just enjoy subscribing for free that is what I expect/and is meaningful to me!!)

@grimalkina I will re-iterate what I have typed before: Dr. Hicks, you are one hell of a writer. And it's clear to me from following you here that you're a helluva human being, as well.

I'm subscribing now, and I wish you and your wife every possible good thing.

Thank you. I feel very fortunate indeed to share a corner of the Web with you.

@grimalkina
A lot of stuff to digest. Very very very interesting and good. And, fwiw, I agree with most you write.

@grimalkina yay for hard conversations about rehumanization in tech.

I had already decided I would need to read this again in the morning when I have fresh mind, when I got to this πŸ˜„ β€œI know this essay is a hard read so far and I want you to take a breather if you need it so let’s do it in this paragraph together.”

@grimalkina Yes. I think that part of the genocide of Gaza is the idea that the Israeli upper class have that they are a different class of human - technical, intelligent, educated, clean, stylish - than the people they are blowing into masses of torn and corroded flesh buried in the rubble of their former apartments - and that those Gazans and Samarians are un-techie, stupid, ignorant, dirty, lacking in style and elegance, and therefore to be disposed of to make way for the Aryan super-race
@grimalkina space suit at the ready…
@UlrikeHahn ❀️ πŸ§‘β€πŸš€
@grimalkina This essay brought me back years to the time after I β€œdefected” from a software engineering role to a design/UX role. After a while I noticed that when I presented research results or UX work, I would be taken much more seriously and questioned less than when the same work was presented by other designers. Basically the assumption was that somehow my coding skills made my UX work more credible. I guess I was Technical.
@jvschrag when you have multiple passports and notice which one gets foregrounded by which people, you learn a lot don't you!!
@grimalkina fantastic piece. Thank you.
@grimalkina that airlock metaphor is powerful. this is an amazing piece, I know I'll be coming back to it. thank you for writing it.

@grimalkina

Yes!

> not only do the structurally empowered eighty-to-ninety-percent-men of technical organizations (100% in a great deal of the research about software topics) get to choose emotions over efficacy, they get to do so while also maintaining the notion that they never have emotions in the first place.

I say this a lot. *men* do this, or "skeptics" or whoever really wants to feel objective and therefore is far more subjective than those who know they are emotional too

@grimalkina
I just read it, absorbing it, which feels a bit like reading poetry.

(I am glad I have kept US big tech at a safe distance. Not that the smaller scale tech I have experienced is idyllic but the problems are perhaps less magnified.)

(My profile here has the tech, the flowers and the poetry. And that's perhaps a lot more radical to some than I already thought)

@grimalkina As you wrote yourself, that text is truly embracing paradoxes. And it works as such.
But if I was asked to untangle some of that, I would ask whether you are writing this as a scientist (who are merely supposed to describe their subjects and not get involved), or as an activist β€œin tech”.
@grimalkina btw. will subscribe (probably RSS?)
And would love to read in a future installement whether your notion of Technical is strictly tied to a capitalist setting or not.

@mb21 "who are merely supposed to describe their subjects and not get involved" --> that is impossible for any human mind to do.

This is not a research artifact. But in my scientific work I consider myself an action researcher, which is explicitly and ethically involved. I am part of the world I study. I have positionality which I disclose, and practices that I use to share data, and methods I adhere to. None of those require me to not be a human being with positionality.

@grimalkina @mb21 Interesting. I didn’t know that psychology was such an β€œapplied science”. Perhaps also related to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normative_science
Normative science - Wikipedia

@grimalkina This is up there with Hunter Thompson’s obituary for Richard Nixon.
@rmi that brings me joy
@grimalkina It’s a polemic in parts and it hurts a lot in others, but underneath everything there’s the hard shiny truth that we need to do better.
@grimalkina I didn’t understand this essay until I read the HackerNews vitriolic comments about it, now I understand perfectly

@grimalkina to summarize:

β€œThis article is hard to follow because it’s not technical enough!”

Yes, exactly, it’s about a human experience

@mattsains πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™
@mattsains there's a great strategy in learning ("the spacing effect") that takes advantage of the fact that we encode better and deeper understanding when we learn things in contrasts (e.g. seeing one thing then a very different thing in the same overall category) rather than many examples of the exact same (like in "cramming" strategies for studying). Anyway nice spacing effect here maybe πŸ˜‚
@mattsains @grimalkina I shouldnβ€˜t have looked….
@mattsains @grimalkina I have never been tempted to go to what my spouse called "the Horrible Orange Website" but I am now.

@grimalkina Signed up! Wish I could do the paid option. Looking forward to more of this.

How do you find time for your research, the podcast, and now a newsletter! Appreciating all the stuff that you are putting out.

@rmflight thank you ❀️
@grimalkina wow thank you great read so relatable in many ways

@grimalkina
Lovely article!

Dunno if you agree but I think that an interesting example on how the "Technical" (culture?) finds ways to unsee humanity its own humanity is to hear how we discuss stuff like "best practices".

There's lots of incredibly interesting stuff to think about there. Practices that work do it AFAIK because of how person-to-person interactions work (or fail to work) across space/teams/time/etc. Instead of observing that we are just happy with the list protips.

@grimalkina
In not seeing the other people on our work we truly damage ourselves and our ability to understand them

IMO this includes even not seeing other Technical People In our work ("code is code" instead of "code as expression").

@grimalkina thank you! Your writing helps me see (american) tech culture in a new perspective. I've never worked in a software startup or big tech, so a lot of it seems strange to me on a surface level. One thing that came to mind is the German-speaking world's obsession with the "engineer" titles, to the point where you have "requirements engineers" and "business engineers".
I remember an English colleague's quip, who obviously didn't think it held any prestige: "I'm not an engineer, I don't have a spanner! "
@grimalkina lol, big tech are scared :D :D :D

@grimalkina Thank you, this is a wonderful essay. I think it's interesting to contemplate how much of this could be said about either patriarchy *or* white supremacy:

> However the very fact that you are Technical means that this fight cannot be won by you. I am sorry to be the one to tell you this, but if my belonging in tech is fundamentally unacceptable yours is uncertain. If you as a Technical person seek to stretch the Technical label it will dissolve in your hands like a wet piece of paper because what you are doing is breaking down the fundamental units that create this label in the first place. To preserve its integrity, a Technical system will reject you sooner than it will accept me. This is why you can’t fight it. You are it. The moment you win that argument you get shoved out the airlock to join me out here in the dark.

@recursive yeah both things are pretty central to all human power structures imho!

@grimalkina Oh. I think I finally got why I always had difficulties getting told I was Technical, why I couln't feel it for anything but almost an insult, and that even if I'm French with not exactly the same crazy level of inequalities as the USA and not the same cultural reference. Or because I'm French and our Grandes Ecoles decides who is Technical and worthy since a couple centuries.

I recognize some background. The same kind of poor family. The idea that people - all of them - matters. My wife being a childcare provider.
And perhaps why I always preferred to take to 5 o'clock train with the hidden workers when I was part of a Technical company, before I created one more fitting to my world views.

So, well, it seems I couldn't give you that Technical medallion even if I wanted, because it didn't even got a chance to dissolve it.

Still. I see you. I see your spectacular competence and efficiency at what you do. I'm glad you chose to do it for a greater good, and to share it with us. Even more glad, given the cost.

And I'm happy to take that bit of ride with you. I hope I will be able to read other nice research and even, perhaps, give other at least a bit interesting feedback.

Thank you so much for sharing that with us. Please, let me take a bit if your shadows while I share my ghosts.

@grimalkina So thought-provoking (as usual); thank you. Provoked thought 1: How can a culture sustain both a) a totalizing idea of the entire universe as a technical problem to be solved and b) a dividing line between what/who gets to be technical and what/who don't? (It's ok; I know it's bc the catalysts of this culture are driven by a human need to be good-enough-via-better-than, shhdon'ttell)
@grimalkina Provoked thought 2: If I’m really Technical, I will be able to navigate outward in the current system that represents my view of the situation described here, to a vantage point where the identified conflict (Technical vs. non-Technical) can be reconciled β€” because that kind of navigation is a fundamental technical skill. In this case, I will be able to reframe Technical as continuous with non-Technical if for no other reason than psychic mechanisms are also mechanisms.
@grimalkina Provoked thought 3: in that light, what is Technical isn't the property or determination of any subset of actors, but a universal birthright. Which is different from saying that we can all hope to attain the property / determination thing if we do x, y, or z.

@grimalkina I get a "Fortinet Secure DNS Service Portal" error "Web Page Blocked! You have tried to access a web page which belongs to a category that is blocked."

is this just me? it started with FF telling me there was no certificate I think

@bazkie hmmmmm I will troubleshoot
@grimalkina This is great. The work skill set I have used the most is explaining technical things to laypeople. It is satisfying to help people understand, but I also hate all the emotional baggage that comes with not understanding. The insecurity is ingrained at a young age, and some never feel worthy.
@CassandraVert or are never allowed to express worthiness perhaps, by the chronic cruelty of this sorting mechanism