Is it just me or too filters in modern search engines do not show any discussions on the background of 1488 becoming a unicode for symbol א, aleph? Someone must have tried to dig this story up.

But all I see is a single post on Medium:
https://medium.com/@wimahl/unicodes-nazi-problem-58fbd4291a7f

#hebrew #israel

Unicode’s Nazi Problem - Ariel Shultz Armijo - Medium

Modern computing has White Christian Supremacy written into some of it’s most fundamental aspects. Sounds a little far fetched? Don’t worry, I fully intend to back up that claim. We’re going to be…

Medium
@naphtali hwhat?!!
1488 for alef, might be a coincidence. That AND 1575 for alif?! What the hell, Unicode?

@alter_kaker personally, I was more impressed with Aleph. Any number in the 1XXX range corresponds to a year with some terrible events—it's just the sad truth of history.

But the first letter of Hebrew being 1488—there should be some funny trolling behind it, right? What is the probability of such a coincidence?

Hebrew alphabet - Wikipedia

@naphtali
Many of the discussions are likely to be well archived and many of the people involved are likely to be alive and easy to interview.

A posteriori arguments as coincidences:
* The count of 88 has only been in place for about 7 out of about 37 years; why did white supremacists wait so long?
* 1488 is a multiple of 16, so is natural to start a sequence;

A posteriori arguments as deliberate:
* with 7 blocks of 16 for Hebrew in v1.0.0, why wasn't aleph... started at x0590 or x05A0? [3]

@naphtali

The ordering that puts Arabic alif as x0627=1575 does look a bit like it could have been done in a tidier way [7].

But Juan de Ovando's best known action in 1575, per the Wikipedias, seems to have been his death [8]. If there are solid [[WP:RS]]es, then the relevance of his final acts for the history of racism should be added to a relevant Wikipedia page, maybe [9].

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_%28Unicode_block%29

[8] https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_de_Ovando_y_Godoy

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limpieza_de_sangre

Arabic (Unicode block) - Wikipedia

@naphtali Can’t really speak to the 1488 issue, but in the author’s Medium post he voices a suspicion that some punctuation marks were duplicated to ensure that position. I looked at the ones that are visually similar, and they are semantically distinct - one that distinguishes a shin from a sin, and two slightly variant vowel forms which likely need to be distinguished for typographical positioning reasons.

@mfessler @naphtali yea, I think they're subtly different, but there've been other languages which have had to suffer squashed minor differences.

But, also, this was the weakest point in the medium article.

@naphtali
Yep, totally bizzarre... Never paid attention to it before though...
@iorsh @naphtali
I doubt it, Hebrew was added to Unicode in 1991, Unicode 1.0, the term in question hasn't been used that way until years later
@uda @iorsh
I agree, in 1991 it could only be known among activists, it was not yet a popular meme.
@naphtali @iorsh
More than that, while 14 words was going around then for a decade already, and though I am not sure when 88 was started, the combination came only a few years later, so not even group members used it as a combined slogan