Is it just me or too filters in modern search engines do not show any discussions on the background of 1488 becoming a unicode for symbol א, aleph? Someone must have tried to dig this story up.

But all I see is a single post on Medium:
https://medium.com/@wimahl/unicodes-nazi-problem-58fbd4291a7f

#hebrew #israel

Unicode’s Nazi Problem - Ariel Shultz Armijo - Medium

Modern computing has White Christian Supremacy written into some of it’s most fundamental aspects. Sounds a little far fetched? Don’t worry, I fully intend to back up that claim. We’re going to be…

Medium
Hebrew alphabet - Wikipedia

@naphtali
Many of the discussions are likely to be well archived and many of the people involved are likely to be alive and easy to interview.

A posteriori arguments as coincidences:
* The count of 88 has only been in place for about 7 out of about 37 years; why did white supremacists wait so long?
* 1488 is a multiple of 16, so is natural to start a sequence;

A posteriori arguments as deliberate:
* with 7 blocks of 16 for Hebrew in v1.0.0, why wasn't aleph... started at x0590 or x05A0? [3]

@naphtali

The ordering that puts Arabic alif as x0627=1575 does look a bit like it could have been done in a tidier way [7].

But Juan de Ovando's best known action in 1575, per the Wikipedias, seems to have been his death [8]. If there are solid [[WP:RS]]es, then the relevance of his final acts for the history of racism should be added to a relevant Wikipedia page, maybe [9].

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_%28Unicode_block%29

[8] https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_de_Ovando_y_Godoy

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limpieza_de_sangre

Arabic (Unicode block) - Wikipedia