@thefwguy @wonofone @Gargron @harljo.uk
The problem is the term 'AI'. It is way too vague. Whenever I bash genAI, some idiot pops up mentioning how it could advance medicine. As if doctors need all our music, writings, landscape photographs or cringe fan art to cure cancer... This is a confusion and hate that parasitic 'AI' devs with their buzzword PR can be thanked for.

@krautdragon @thefwguy @wonofone @Gargron @harljo.uk i was replying to your post addressing your mischaracterizations
the peacocks and all that follows is a clear problem already discussed by competent people. does the original poster's idea of children of the future being confused by the inability to discern between reality and generated content seem frightening? yes! does it seem plausible? not at all
@krautdragon @thefwguy @wonofone @Gargron @harljo.uk to be clear here it's not the term of genAI that was eliciting a response but rather this explicit passage:
> As if doctors need all our music, writings, landscape photographs or cringe fan art to cure cancer... This is a confusion and hate that parasitic 'AI' devs with their buzzword PR can be thanked for.
@feliks @thefwguy @wonofone @Gargron @harljo.uk What. That makes your response even worse, sorry.
Yes doctors do not need those silly things for their AI tools. And yes, it is the recent buzzword genAI toy market's fault that AI is now a dirty umbrella term.
Nothing of that was a mischaracterisation. Wtf 😭
@krautdragon @feliks @thefwguy @wonofone @Gargron @harljo.uk I've been on this platform for longer than a year atleast but this is honestly the first time I've seen this on fediverse
Devolving threads are common on xitter(the X is pronounced sh), and reddit, even coming across them in literal minutes after opening the respective platforms for the first time but I'm honestly proud of the Fediverse especially mastodon for throwing only self-respecting people my way so far.