Finland ends homelessness and ...
Giving apartments to the chronically homeless can save taxpayer dollars, advocates say
@brenttoderian.bsky.social and while the post is new, look at the date on the article: 2014!
The news should be " My God, we've had evidence that this works for over 10 years. Why haven't we acted on it? "
@PaulWermer @brenttoderian.bsky.social There is a long standing fear, among the ownership class of most nations: if the threat of hunger and homelessness is eliminated, people will not work for them. Or at least they will demand better conditions than the owners are willing to provide.
This goes back at least to the English Poor Laws and the workhouse.
The accommodations for the poor are always made unpleasant or humiliating, even if doing so costs more.
There's a lot of misinformation out there about the concept of universal basic income. If you want to be well-informed, follow me and learn about what we know from studies in this thread: https://bsky.app/profile/scottsantens.com/post/3lckzcleo7s24 Here's a UBI starter pack too: https://bsky.app/profile/scottsantens.com/post/3lbctsxrxts2c And here's a UBI 101 link: https://www.scottsantens.com/universal-basic-income-for-all-unconditional-why-ubi-is-necessary-now-evidence-experiments/
@brenttoderian.bsky.social the benefits for society are evident in Finland for some 15 years now. *Still* there are few nations following suit. Because „socialism“: you can't provide help, if it might hurt some businesses profit.
Lobbyism is something that was always so present, that not even communists have its threat worked out, but even today most people of a democratic mind don't, either.