Fi 🏳️⚧️
Hey if you put a DEI policy in your open source projects, the feds can't use it now right? Hey if you put a DEI policy in your open source projects, the feds can't use it now right? Hey if you put a DEI policy in your open source projects, the feds can't use it now right?
Hilko Bengen@munin Oh, this is just like using AGPL against certain tech companies. I like.
Tim Lavoie
Ysegrim@munin If that doesn't help, add a required parameter
equity=True to some constructors.
Beluga
dr 🛠️🛰️📡🎧
Alice Averlong🏳️⚧️@munin Gonna license my next project by saying you need to be trans to use it
Amber 
"Only pull requests from organizations with a public DEI policy will be accepted"
I AM BANKSY ☕ / 🗑🔥@munin forget requiring a Jira ticket in your comment - link to dei program on your web site.
@puppygirlhornypost2 @munin it's a standard proof-of-attire system, yes.
I'm tempted to make an analytical AI system to determine if a given picture contains striped thigh-highs, for use in a git hook
jbz@munin I think you can do that with the CoC, no need to modify a license.
calcifer 🧯@munin @remotenemesis the only way to do this such that an agency couldn’t just easily remove the concepts is to use license terms. I see two ways to do that
Make a non-open-source license, restrict use by any org with an anti-DEI stance. This does create some new problems, but is likely to be effective
Make a license that requires any use or distribution (AGPL-style) to include the “STATEMENT_OF_VALUES.md” file, which contains a statement in support of diversity.
I favor (2), because it keeps it open-source. You can’t stop the government from ignoring the license, but you could at least make it so they’d be breaking the law to use it.
Pines@munin Well, they are still corrupt self-interested hypocrites 🤷♀️
vriska, thief of light 
@munin wasn't there something about how if you put a donation link with a "recommended" amount they legally have to pay it
noodlejetski 
@munin where's the curl guy when you need him
Efi (nap pet) 🦊💤@munin assuming the feds follow the law, which seems like a stretch
lol you have it backwards - it's nowt legal; it's putting "problematic" terms in the codebase so the commissariat will punish anyone in gov who introduces it.
Basically hijacking an autoimmune response.
@munin im not sure that works like that
🔶Mark Nicoll 3.5%🏴🇬🇧🇪🇺🇺🇳
Thomas Lunsford@munin Brilliant!
@munin All namespaces must include "DEI", "woke", or "cis".