👉 https://openscienceretreat.zbw.eu/
Dear @ZBW_MediaTalk, I am pretty sad to see big #openscience players falling into the AI trap. During the RDA plenary, they at least put some question marks (where the whole community could answer "LLMs is shit, garbage in - garbage out").
in 2025, #openscience is primarily about diversity equity and inclusivity. It is not too late to stand for our values, at least where it is still legal to do so.
PS: Words like "stakeholders" do not help either, please read Reed, M.S., Merkle, B.G., Cook, E.J. et al. Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world. Sustain Sci 19, 1481–1490 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01496-4
Language matters in shaping perceptions and guiding behaviour. The term stakeholder is widely used, yet little attention is paid to the possibility that its use may inadvertently perpetuate colonial narratives and reinforce systemic inequities. In this article, we critically examine the limitations of the stakeholder concept and its ambiguity, normativity, and exclusionary implications. We emphasise the importance of using language that gives a voice to marginalised groups, promotes inclusion and equity, and fosters meaningful and reflexive participation in decision-making processes. In critiquing the use of the term and calling for alternative practices, we aim to contribute to the decolonisation of research norms and the creation of more inclusive and equitable societies. Therefore, rather than advocating a single alternative term, we suggest a focus on the people, places, and species affected by decisions, interventions, projects, and issues.
AI DOGE MUSK
@jcolomb Thank you for your comment and your PS on the term stakeholder!
The Open Science Retreat will also address the question of how the principles of Open Science can be ensured in times of AI / LLMs. The OS movement needs to discuss what new challenges (and opportunities) we are facing here. An exchange on this topic is very welcome.