This article is very uncomfortable to read. https://www.wheresyoured.at/never-forgive-them/
Never Forgive Them

In the last year, I’ve spent about 200,000 words on a kind of personal journey where I’ve tried again and again to work out why everything digital feels so broken, and why it seems to keep getting worse, despite what tech’s “brightest” minds might promise. More

Ed Zitron's Where's Your Ed At
@r343l I went there and it ironically interrupted me to demand I join its free newsletter
@Forbearance lol yes. I reflexively save all links to a read later app so I saved it a a day or two ago from the iphone share sheet (sent straight to read later app w/o loading link) and so didn't notice that popup subscribe until I loaded the link in a browser to make sure I had a "clean" link (Pocket absurdly adds a shortener / tracker now). Notice all the little cuts the article talks about just in me sharing the link!

@r343l I don't think the article's conclusion of "it is sufficient to complain loudly about this problem" is really going to cut it, though.

How do we... stop doing these things?

@Forbearance I don't think the author's intent was to propose a concrete plan of action so much as to write something that makes a variety of people of different tech backgrounds and preferences actually recognize and label the problem, in a very intensely emotional way.
@r343l Well yes, but, having labeled it, we now must solve it.

@Forbearance @r343l for me, no #Twitter no #Facebook and I’m cutting down on my #YouTube.

I have beaten all kinds of addictions including meth and meat. But the addictions from #SocialMedia is its own level of toughness.

@Forbearance @r343l while reading:

  • 3 popup messages to join the newsletter.
  • 2 inline ads asking me to join the conversation.

Still, it was a good article. I liked:

Aside: I swear to god, if your answer here is “get a MacBook Air, they’re only $600,”

But I was thinking "how do we grt #Linux on those $300 cheapo laptops?"

@ktneely @r343l It would improve them. But mere open-source-ness is not a perfect defense against the equipment having a hidden agenda (see: Ubuntu Pro). And to the extent it works it's another way that, as the article notes, technology experts can partially insulate themselves from the negative effects of technology that, statistically, they probably peddle as a day job.
@ktneely @r343l Perhaps we should declare advertisement, interruption, or other actions against the user's interest to be forbidden, in the mode of medical malpractice, or misconduct by a financial advisor.
@ktneely @r343l Perhaps this is one of the numerous problems that, like most things in NP, reduces to the destruction of capitalism.
@ktneely @Forbearance @r343l I had the same idea. I ran Linux on a $100 used Intel Chromebook in college

@ktneely @Forbearance @r343l

Ideally, we don't.

If you want to run teh linux on a cheap laptop, your best bet today is a refurb thinkpad from an ebay seller with lots of sales and a good rep.

Yes, it's older hardware - but that's why it works.

If we all opt out of new shit hardware, they'll stop making it. Not giving them your money is kryptonite.

Sadly - it won't help,with most of the points in that excellent rant. But it's a toehold. It may not give you what you want, but it might get you what you need.

@Forbearance @r343l I wasn't going to say anything...

When the 3rd ad promised me no ads, I lost interest 🤣

@Forbearance @r343l yeah, I like Ed Zitron's stuff but the subscribe ad embedded three times and two pop-up versions of it, even though I'm already subscribed...
@Forbearance @r343l Yes, I stopped reading there.
@Forbearance @r343l glad it wasn't just me who noticed that