@CAWguy @Viss There are two competing needs in my area related to this. One is a need for bright lights to see the many large animals that like to cross the road at night, such as elk, moose, and bears.

However, the other is a need to not get blinded by oncoming traffic so you have absolutely no chance of seeing those animals in your lane.

I think a nice compromise would be dimmer “normal” lights and brighter “brights” for when nobody is in front of you.

@thomasareed @CAWguy tech exists to detect oncoming cars and dim the region theyre in
@Viss @CAWguy My car even has something similar to that, but it only works if my lights are set to “auto,” and I prefer my lights to be on all the time. It also takes forever to decide there’s no longer a car in front of you.
@thomasareed @CAWguy there are newer cars that have LED matrices instead of one huge bulb, so they can literally create a dim spot to trace opposing traffic as it moves. not sure which cars that stuff actually lives in tho. audi i think?

@Viss @thomasareed @CAWguy Well, curve headlights are almost as old as I am but for the most part the adjustment of lights is still done by a servo motor moving aboit the reflector, not the LEDs or bulbs themselves.

It's just that there is no hard law re: headlights to prevent #CleanDiesel-like #cheating!

Kevin Karhan :verified: (@[email protected])

@[email protected] *nodds in agreement* so many assholes nowadays seem to be tacidly unaware that their regular headlights are blinding other drivers worse than if I pop in the brightest, street-legal lamps in my car and drive with highbeams all the time. - This is why @[email protected] and @[email protected] / @[email protected] / #KBA need to fuckibg step- up their game and demand that headlights under no circumstances must have more then 0° elevation *AND* have a maximum installation height if 25cm above ground ob any car with *no exceptions - even retroactively*!

Infosec.Space