M4 efficiency is stunning. First machine I've tested getting over 5 Gflops/W with HPL, and in fact it goes beyond 6 Gflops/W... with fan only spinning up to a quiet 2500 rpm.

Maybe this is why Qualcomm abandoned their marquee Dev Kit—it is thoroughly trounced by M4.

@geerlingguy did you check idle power without ethernet connected, I found it to make a big difference.
@paul @geerlingguy did you test the 1G or 10G? Probably base model?
@timo @geerlingguy I did 10G on base model, 1G on Pro. Both were down at < 1.5W idle without ethernet/HDMI/Thunderbolt.

@paul @timo Insane.

Like... other companies should try to even come close. The thing is, Apple started with mobile-optimized architecture, and applied all those learnings to macOS as well.

Other OSes and chips just assume you have wall power. What's 3W here, 8W there...

Benchmark M4 Mac mini · Issue #47 · geerlingguy/top500-benchmark

I have an M4 Mac mini with 10 CPU cores and 32 GB of RAM. Would be nice to see the results and efficiency.

GitHub
@geerlingguy you got 4.xW with nothing connected but power? I got it down to low 1.x, wonder why the difference.
@paul What power monitoring setup do you have? I tested on a Kill-A-Watt and a ThirdReality Zigbee Smart Outlet. And I did have HDMI plugged in, and my Thunderbolt dock (for keyboard and mouse), so it's enumerating other devices on the TB bus. Could use more power doing that.
@geerlingguy oh yeah both HDMI and Thunderbolt will cause it to use more power. I tested it with literally nothing but power plugged in, I think with just 10GbE plugged in it was using about 3W.