M4 efficiency is stunning. First machine I've tested getting over 5 Gflops/W with HPL, and in fact it goes beyond 6 Gflops/W... with fan only spinning up to a quiet 2500 rpm.

Maybe this is why Qualcomm abandoned their marquee Dev Kit—it is thoroughly trounced by M4.

@geerlingguy did you check idle power without ethernet connected, I found it to make a big difference.
@paul @geerlingguy did you test the 1G or 10G? Probably base model?
@timo @geerlingguy I did 10G on base model, 1G on Pro. Both were down at < 1.5W idle without ethernet/HDMI/Thunderbolt.

@paul @timo Insane.

Like... other companies should try to even come close. The thing is, Apple started with mobile-optimized architecture, and applied all those learnings to macOS as well.

Other OSes and chips just assume you have wall power. What's 3W here, 8W there...

Benchmark M4 Mac mini · Issue #47 · geerlingguy/top500-benchmark

I have an M4 Mac mini with 10 CPU cores and 32 GB of RAM. Would be nice to see the results and efficiency.

GitHub
@geerlingguy @paul @timo A headless Mac mini needs just two cables to work. Who is going to drill a hole in the side of their fridge? You’ll hardly notice it next to the Bud.

@ashpole @geerlingguy @paul @timo It could probably run fine on one cable if the mini supported PoE.

(It can run on one cable when using WiFi, but that would be problematic in the fridge?)