I really try to hang out in more nuanced modes of rhetoric but: Don’t amplify psychological terrorism by repeating it in social media posts condemning it. Stop.

When you do this, no matter your intent, you are helping the worst people by repeatedly exposing the intended targets to the terrorizing messages.

Yes, hate campaigns need to be discussed. Not by amplifying the messages themselves across networks rich in their targets.

Terrified people getting constantly re-terrified can’t think clearly. We all need to be thinking as clearly as we can. This was true in 2016 and during the early-pandemic info vacuum and it’s true now.
@kissane Is there a way to protect people's psyches without playing nice? I blame playing by the rules for the US loss.

@PassiveIdeation This isn’t about rules at all, it’s about taking care of people’s brains and bodies so they can do the essential work of fighting fascism, which begins with not spinning out into despair and terror.

There are so many orgs working on defense and care and action, and none of that work is served by amplifying trolls. The people whose interests are served by paralysis and a constant state of fight or flight are the fascists.

@kissane I think we lack counter propaganda. I hope that's possible without amplifying trolls.

From Small Steps, Big Impact: Combating Hate Through Individual Actions -- it's phrased in terms of disinformation but applies to hate campaigns in general:

  • avoiding amplification

  • naming the motivations behind disinformation

  • avoiding posting the disinformation on other social media platforms

  • going on the offense and posting as much truthful information as possible

  • and using engaging content (graphics, memes, videos, etc.) that guarantees the spread of factual information.

@PassiveIdeation @kissane @quizzicus

Small Steps, Big Impact: Combating Hate Through Individual Actions

Combating hate and disinformation has become more crucial than ever.

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
@PassiveIdeation @kissane i fear the time for counter propoganda is over, we lost the meme war due in part to it being harder to articulate many of the arguments democrats(or many other kinds of progressives) have for the policies we support in a format that can be ingested in the three second attention span of most social media users(not an insult, it is a consequence of the platforms). I think it is time to hunker down and ask what we can do locally to support those in need.

@PassiveIdeation @kissane don’t spread misinformation because not only might it further hurt the public grasp of reality but the strategy may backfire. Folks need to get better at spreading the truth in a way that folks trust and understand.

Many folks on social media are calling truthful and accurate journalism propaganda. It’s okay to be knowledgeable and have an agenda/goal.

@IanStuart @PassiveIdeation @kissane The truth honed to an edge will always be stronger than a lie.

@pawsplay @PassiveIdeation @kissane a major problem I run into with trying to spread very reasonable perspectives is that some fields are inherently extremely complex when people want simple answers.

Furthermore I strongly suspect some fields are man-made so to speak and may be intentionally complex or built upon societal structures that are meant to help certain classes of people more than others. In my judgment, one such field is mainstream #Economics

@pawsplay @IanStuart

Not when Right Wing Media has such an outsized influence on the electorate.

Not just Fox and other large RW media outlets; it’s the Andrew Tates and the Charley Kirks!

@PassiveIdeation @kissane
If you're including your opponents' messaging in your propaganda, you're doing it very, very wrong.