@Felienne Great talk! I watched the live stream. Agree that the field needs to challenge and broaden its own methods rather than just try to invite people in. I've regularly hit on the strange argument that programming language design _must_ not involve any interaction with the outside world.
At the end of the day I suppose if the field can't open up, it can't meet any of its aims. Clearly you can't make more humane systems while maintaining culture that actively excludes much of humanity by gender, and without exploring human factors. I guess my question is, is it better to just give up on problematic fields and make a new interdisciplinary one from scratch, that's healthier? I guess the academic metric game works against this but I think the payoff could be huge..
(That first 'question' was astonishing, session chairs need training to call out and shut down disrespectful timewasters ASAP!)