The official Mastodon app (and most other Fediverse apps) do not collect any data about you.

When you sign up on a Fediverse server, it asks for the minimum amount of information (an email address and a password) and none of this info goes to the app or app makers.

This is in stark contrast to other social networks which seem to collect lots of personal info. See the attached image for a comparison of the privacy policies of various official social network apps.

#Privacy #FediTips #Fediverse

@FediTips well bsky at least does not seem to sniff browsing history… but the others 😰
@mariuszklimczak @FediTips Yeah I was thinking that same thing. Bluesky at least looks like reasonable stuff their own service might want to make recommendations to you.

@edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak @FediTips

Well, it is certainly better than Threads, but how do you think Bluesky plans to make a buck? It's you. Your content and your personally identifying data. If you are cool with that, go for it.

@mastodonmigration @mariuszklimczak @FediTips
I'm on Mastodon because I love the whole idea of a voluntary decentralized network. But at the same time... I'm also not like super opposed to the concept of a company needing to use some of my data to sell targeted advertisements, so they can make some money doing it. Being a software developer myself I completely understand that people have mouths to feed and business is business. I -love- l open source software, and I contribute. But it also doesn't pay bills a lot of the time.

If its done in a responsible way, like Bluesky seems like they're trying to, it's not that big a deal. I prefer Mastodon but I'm also not terrified of companies selling me targeted ads. As long as I feel like the company doing this ad brokering is somewhat responsible, its fine.

There's a very big difference between selling targeted ads (while keeping your data inside the company's own databases), and literally selling your data.

@edward_jazzhands @mastodonmigration @mariuszklimczak

BlueSky are a for-profit corporation backed by VC money.

Whenever this structure has been applied to online services, it has inevitably resulted in "enshittification" where initially-reasonable policies gradually spiral out of control into full-scale surveillance. The VC investor-owners will demand ever more growth, and eventually the only way to grow will be to screw users.

VC-funding is incompatible with respecting users in long term.

@FediTips @edward_jazzhands @mastodonmigration @mariuszklimczak this type of fear mongering and hand-wavy prophecies frankly undermine the whole message and merit of the mastodon model.

“We’re better because they are worse, believe me”.

@securescientist @FediTips @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak

FediTips did not "fear monger" nor "handwave" they stated facts. Corporate websites need revenue to satisfy their investors. Revenue does not magically happen. They need to sell something to someone. If it is not in app ads it can only be your content and your personal data. In time it will likely be both. That's just facts.

If you are fine with this, that's cool, but that's the way it is.

@mastodonmigration @FediTips @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak that’s just good’ol anti capitalist sentiment. Of course money has to come from somewhere, whether that requires to “screw users” by “disrespecting” them inevitably leading to a “full-scale surveillance” setup is prophetic fear mongering.

Ideology has always been myopic.

@securescientist @mastodonmigration @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak

Money does have to come from somewhere, but covering costs and growing profits are two totally different things.

A lot of the essential infrastructure that for-profit activity depends on isn't itself for-profit. For example most roads are just funded to cover costs, they aren't growing profits or even making any profit at all.

@securescientist @mastodonmigration @FediTips @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak I mean, Facebook and Google are great examples of this trajectory. They *used* to be more reasonable, but they kept chasing money at all costs.

@securescientist @FediTips @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak

Luca. Not trying to be disrespectful here. But, rather than speak in generalities, please try to think about it from a business perspective. Initially money comes from investors, so they can offer free stuff. But investors only do this to attract users. Eventually the business must make money. So they must sell something. What do you think Bluesky will sell? Serious question. What are their options for making money?

@mastodonmigration @FediTips @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak sure it will sell user information, to a degree or another, to become viable financially. Users need not be screwed and the platform needs not be a surveillance one for the model to be sustainable. Assuming it *must* be is ideology. I rebut the simplistic, dismissive assumption that it’s either mastodon or doom. I’m just not one for black and white arguments.

@securescientist @FediTips @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak

'Black and white arguements'? Not sure what you mean. You just agreed they will sell your user information and you seem fine with that. So, what's the issue? FediTips entire point was that you and your data would become their product. If that works for you, cool. I guess you don't like their terminology, but that's how they and many others view this kind of surveillance capitalism, you just have a difference of opinion.

@mastodonmigration @FediTips @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak perhaps bad English, sorry. Black and white as in either this was or that way, no way in between. I think it’s an expression in English too but I may be wrong.

@securescientist @FediTips @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak

It is. Guess you mean that you don't think all surveillance capitalism is bad. In that, you are certainly in the majority, because most people willfully give away all their personal information.

Some of us here on Mastodon are particularly sensitive to the issue because of all the history of abuse. Also in the US we don't have GDPR so the government is not a protection from the worst abuses.

@mastodonmigration @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak at the risk of seeming patronizing, have you read https://bsky.social/about/blog/7-05-2023-business-plan ? It’s vague, incomplete, and somewhat defeating, but it does set out a structure and some principles around which the business model will be built. And those do not go in the direction you give for granted. Perhaps you have access to better info than I do to be so conclusive, @FediTips & all.
Our Plan for a Sustainably Open Social Network - Bluesky

We've been exploring avenues of monetization other than traditional advertising, and have raised a seed round to support our mission and growth.

Bluesky

@securescientist @mastodonmigration @edward_jazzhands @mariuszklimczak

Whatever principles are set out are meaningless once the pressure is put on them to grow faster.

BlueSky is very reminiscent of Ello:

https://waxy.org/2024/01/the-quiet-death-of-ellos-big-dreams/

TL:DR:

"Despite their idealist manifesto and their Bill of Rights, I don’t believe they could ever truly be in partnership with their community once they were taking large amounts of venture funding. All of their ideals and big dreams were easily undone, even the legal restrictions they defined in their Public Benefit Corporation charter."

The Quiet Death of Ello's Big Dreams - Waxy.org

Ello launched in 2014 with big dreams, but the artsy social network suddenly shut down last year, deleting nine years of posts without warning. What happened?

Waxy.org

@securescientist @edward_jazzhands @mastodonmigration @mariuszklimczak

It's not "hand-wavy prophecies" or "fear mongering", it's just what has happened and will happen again with orgs that use this particular structure.

If you take investment money you are giving investors power over you. Investors, especially VCs, don't just want to cover costs, they want profit growth. In the online world, that inevitably leads to surveillance and "enshittification". Can you give an example otherwise?