JA Westenberg
I like how we’re debating AI ethics while we’re still figuring out which humans get to have rights
Sep 5, 2024 at 1:34pmBuffer
Show threadLars Wikman (OLD, find new)Sep 5, 2024

@Daojoan golden opportunity to transfer the rights of humans to the machines!

We could actually get rid of a lot of human rights and maybe improve the rights of not just machine learning but also more commonplace math. What do you think?

There can of course only ever be roughly 128 rights in circulation.

Show threadMaxilo OveritSep 5, 2024

@Daojoan

Legal "persons" have rights. Not humans.

So, corporations eventually will have all the rights.

Show threadThe OwlChemistSep 5, 2024
@Daojoan to be fair, most of the discussion revolving around AI is in regards to the rights of humans: 1) to have a sustainable world and 2) to protect their creative works.
Show threadAlien AnomalySep 5, 2024

@Daojoan

That’s easy.

Silicon Valley AI has rights
Some rich white people have rights
Everyone else can fuck off

Show threadShadow06Sep 5, 2024
@Daojoan Obviously the humans who build AI, duh
Show threadThe Third WheelSep 5, 2024
@Daojoan evidently, not all humans can expect to have equal rights when it comes to Ai ethics. Take me for example. I am not allowed to have control over my own devices. Why? I have no idea. I think it has something to do with me being a woman.
Show threadxs4me2Sep 5, 2024
@Daojoan Terrible, isn’t it…
Show threadIris Young (he/they/she) (PhD)Sep 5, 2024
@Daojoan I wouldn't be surprised if it's partly strategic. If they can shape and direct the narrative and even the questions we raise to focus on issues within the tech-will-solve-everything paradigm, there's less to fight. We're indebted to people like Timnit Gebru for bringing the fight to them anyway.