Wondering if wealth inequality is out of control?

Well, Jeff Bezos made over $7.9 million an hour last year.

In just 13 minutes, he made the equivalent of what a typical person earns in a lifetime.

Don't tell me that the rich can't afford a wealth tax.

@rbreich Billionaires will happily pay rack rates for 5 star hotels. Why do we think they won't pay rack rate taxes to live in these five star nations we provide them? We need to stop thinking billionaires will only stick around if we charge them Motel 6 rates. There are already plenty of tax havens where they could move to. But they stick around North America because of the rule of law, safety, entertainment, and work forces we all provide them.
@skepticsbookoflists @rbreich maybe, but a global minimum tax agreement for the wealthy wouldn’t hurt 😉.

@rbreich It doesn't matter.

You can point this out every single day to every single human on Earth. It won't ever matter until someone DOES something about it.

They have too much power, so you can't do anything about it, until people start getting the pitchforks sharpened and the torches lit.

@NosirrahSec @rbreich It might be too late now for that.

@NosirrahSec @rbreich nah. No violence needed; not towards anything living anyhow. The wealthy could easily use violent incidents to play into their own power.

We need to show that they are no better than us. We need to the world to see that such inequality is bad for democracy. We need to call out how poverty leads to shorter lifespans. This is not a battle that can be won overnight. The fight for #humanRights and #basicDignity is a long-term ongoing struggle.

@IanStuart @rbreich Yeah, you can shit in one hand and wish that simply talking about the problem will solve it into your other hand.

Let me know which hand yields results first. It's 2024 and the wish hand has been empty since the 60s when Billionaires gained control of society at large.

@rbreich Is my math correct? $7.9M an hour = $131,666 a minute. x13 minutes = $1.7M. I worked 35+ years and that number is a lottery daydream - “typical person” my ass.
@thekidhaz @rbreich Makes sense, right? 1.7 million over working lifetime? Roughly 50k over 35 years.
@arjankroonen @rbreich 35 years WAS my working lifetime and you need to divide that number in half for me to be able to wave at it as it sails by.
@thekidhaz @rbreich I guess the number is obtained by multiplying the median wage per the average work lifetime in the US. If you do that, you obtain a figure of around $1.6M, which is between 12 and 13 minutes of Bezos earnings. Whether "median" and "average" are a good representation of the "typical" situation, is a whole different story.

@rbreich The thing about the wealth tax is that it doesn’t actually make the super wealthy poorer.

A wealth tax just slightly decreases the rate at which they grow wealthier.

Yes, they can afford a wealth tax!

@rbreich he could afford to fund every single teachers’ Amazon wishlist and still be a billionaire, while I’m out here begging for pencils and paying my taxes
@rbreich But earning only 7.9m in 26 minutes eliminates inCEnTiveS! /s

@rbreich the "not being able to afford it" part never was an issue...

But as a former Secretary of Labor you surely know that one.

The far more interesting point is, why where you not keen/able to fix it when in office?

@rbreich Bezos wanted to be a dragon when he grew up.

https://www.skeletonclaw.com/image/189021631783

Skeleton Claw: Photo

Comics

Tumblr
@rbreich Out of control greed will kill the human race.
@rbreich they can afford a tax, what they can't afford is ordinary people starting to believe that all laws that apply the poor also apply to the billionaires

@rbreich Income taxes are easier to collect and harder to avoid. They are withheld at the source if necessary. They could certainly be much higher for those with very high incomes.

We don't have wealth taxes because they are difficult to collect, with a few exceptions.

Real estate is relatively easy to tax because it can't move. Vehicles can be taxed because they have to be licensed to use the public roads. We tax those.

Other forms of wealth are more difficult.

How do you determine the value of a nest of offshore shell corporations?

A wealth tax is also problematical with very volatile assets. One could incur a ruinous tax liability due to a momentary spike in its price.

Of course, there would be capital flight to jurisdictions that do not impose such a tax.

@rbreich I agree with the problem. Taxation seems like an odd way to go about it. You're saying someone can amass more wealth than is humanly necessary - exploiting people as they go. And our only recourse against them is to make them pay a very expensive tax? Not to be regressive but why not rethink the system? Taxation seems too reactive.

@rbreich A friend once told me about a rich guy she knew: "He says he makes $1000 every three minutes. Oh, but he's a really nice person!"

Me: "If I made $1000 every three minutes I'd be a really nice person too!"

@rbreich sorry but bazos did not “make” anything, nor did he “earn” any of that. We should call this what it is, theft.
@rbreich ofcourse they can, the question is why is it not happening?
@rbreich
The usual argument is if you impose a wealth tax they will take themselves & their money elsewhere & you then won't get any tax out of them

@rbreich

Americans that owned homes made an additional $50,000 last year (on average) in addition to their salary.