Jan R. BoehnkeNice listen on my way to work, very helpful to focus my mind for a session of our School #ResearchEthics Committee:
"Episode 40: Tabula de Ethicis Recensionibus"
https://nulliusinverba.podbean.com/e/irb/
@NulliusInVerba
Interesting thought about the amount of effort required in application procedures [38:24min]:
"If you cut away the ethics part [...] not a lot would change."
Episode 40: Tabula de Ethicis Recensionibus | Nullius in Verba
In this episode, we discuss review boards for research with human subjects. Are they necessary? Are they efficient? Are scientists well equipped to make judgements about ethics? And are economists more ethical than psychologists? Shownotes Whitney, S. N. (2015). Balanced ethics review: A guide for institutional review board members. Springer. Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical imperialism: Institutional review boards and the social sciences, 1965–2009. JHU Press. Kinsey ReportsMasters & Johnson How Institutional Review Boards can be (and are) Weaponized Against Academic Freedom Weaponizing the IRB 2.0 Psychologists’ Involvement in Torture and the APA. Psychology Today.