Hi! I'd really like to share this, but since I have vision-impared friends & followers, I only share images with alt text. Here is an #alt4u you could use if you were so inclined. Cheers!
The trolly problem meme: a trolly hurdles down a line drawing of a single track. Up ahead, the track splits into two tracks. A person stands ready at a lever which will change the path of the trolly from one track to another.
On the straight track is the Earth, in colour, with the caption: "one habitable biosphere". On the offshoot track is Mr. Monopoly with the caption "2700 billionaires"
Shouldn't Trolley Problems be a hard dilemma?
did you mean a trolley solution ?
@VeroniqueB99 whilst i would run down the billionaires. nobody should hoard that wealth. they're not the problem.
the problem is basically everyone (else). to anyone: justify owning a car. you and your other car owners are a huge problem. why won't you stop? you're 17% of global emissions. yes, you're a tiny amount of that and can't make a difference. just like every other car owner. nothing changes. you're still the problem.
@VeroniqueB99 cruise ships are 0.06% of global emissions. the entire merchant fleet, 1.7%. cars, 17%. expend your energy more effectively. cruise ships might be a marquee cause, they're not The Problem. cars are The Problem. fossil fuelled power is even bigger. nuclear is basically 0%. given france's success with nuclear, and norway's with waste disposal, what is the reason for not going all in on nuclear? takes a long time to build? so what? the future of the earth, and the species lasts longer than the next decade. having said that, i'm not sure right now that's actually true. but yes, cruise ships and their 0.06%, that'll fix it.
and yes, i am fucking angry about this. it's what i do for a living, and no fucker anywhere actually cares about making an actual difference. the drought in africa right now? people are going to die. in droves. still, european sensibilities on the causes of climate change.
@VeroniqueB99 sorry, to be shouty, but i do long term climate modelling. on the track we're on right now, we're utterly f*cked. nobody is addressing the big problems. we're all complaining about cruise ships. it means the petro industry gets off scot free. they love it.
anyway, as i say, i don't want to be awful about this, but if you're looking closely, the problem is obvious, and urgent.
we have four scenarios we deal with (to keep it simple). CO2 in the atmosphere. all are plausible in certain scenarios.
1.5%, 2.5%, 4.5%, and 8.5%.
1.5% is alarming. most of the others are wild. 8.5% is borderline hilarious... because people are not taking this seriously.
anyway. enough ranting. thank you for reading. going to bed. g'night.
@pavsmith Jesus... we're utterly f*cked indeed. I actually believe that and when you look around at what - if anything- is being done, it doesn't take a genius to see how bad it's going to get. No one is taking it seriously. You are quite right. The problem is, the short term $$$ is SO much more important.
It must be maddening for someone in your position. I'm sorry.
night.
@VeroniqueB99 now there we can agree 100%!
The 0.06% comes from looking at the gross tonnage of the global merchant fleet vs. the cruise fleet tonnage and doing a simple calculation.
Problem is cruise ships can't use "bunker fuel" which tankers, etc. can. Think burning asphalt, but worse! The amount of sulphur. Blerk!
Anyway, let's kill cars!
@pavsmith it's a lot easier to live without a car in Europe than it is in the US so good luck with that killing! 🤣 Having said that, same with oil industry, good luck, they're so damned rich they can buy any government... 🤷♀️ on and on it goes... it's so sad to look at idk how you do it. You better develop a good grounding practice (meditation) cuz you need to do some serious self care.
(btw the reason I hate cruise ships isn't so much their carbon footprint but more their business practices)
It remains a dilemma, since the habitable biosphere (or rather the dominant social and productive conditions) created the 2700 billionaires. By confusing billionaires (or rather capitalists as agents) for capital, it is easy to anthropomorphize a consequence.
To quote a footnote from Capital:
The contrast between the power, based on the personal relations of dominion and servitude, that is conferred by landed property, and the impersonal power that is given by money, is well expressed by the two French proverbs, “Nulle terre sans seigneur,” and “L’argent n’a pas de maître,” – “No land without its lord,” and “Money has no master.”