"The 'middle-class' is a faux class. It never really existed. If you have a boss, and earn wages or salary, you are a worker, and should be proud to be in the working class. The term 'middle class' isolates more privileged workers for the benefit of the powerful so that anyone outside of elite circles will be divided and fighting against each other instead of fighting institutions and the power structure."
—David Graeber
@MikeDunnAuthor RIP, David, I wish you had the chance to write another book or essay.
@MikeDunnAuthor it is true, but all people have feelings and thoughts and are worthy. The only acceptable out-group is those who mistreat or don't give others the room to do their own thing.
@jasper @MikeDunnAuthor so..... The ruling class/rich people/landlords lmao
@MikeDunnAuthor hearing Harris rattle on and on about the middle class made me feel like it's 2000 again. Seriously? Why are we still pretending the middle class is a) a thing, & b) more important than the "lower class"? Middle class is already elevated by definition, if you're going to focus on any segment, it should be lower class every time. Doing anything else doesn't make any fucking sense.
@MikeDunnAuthor yep, saw that work when I was meeting for a beer after sports with some guys. They were telling their work problems, and they felt exactly like my problems, too. Then one guy pointed at me, and said that this stuff was studied people's fault - by people like me. Crass.
@MikeDunnAuthor that reminds me of an article I read long time ago in NYT. The TL;DR version of it was that most - if not all - middle class families in USA that had it all (expensive cars, big homes, private schools for children etc) couldn't provide $500 in cash, in case of an emergency. Everything was in credit. ..and that's sad because with the blink of an eye, they could go to being homeless - and downgraded in this class system. I don't know if that's the case now.
@MikeDunnAuthor The middle class is that group in society composed of professionals, semi-professionals, and lower-to-middle managerial level workers, distinguishable from unskilled laborers. It is a useful concept as it clarifies the value of education. Only by getting a higher education can you become a doctor, lawyer, engineer, etc. and reap the economic benefits thereof. The big debate now is about the cost to obtain that education versus the benefit.
@MikeDunnAuthor Sorry, but more to say on this. That quote triggered me! When young, I worked many labor jobs of various kinds. Got paid peanuts and was bored to death. After getting a college degree, I went on to different management jobs that paid decently and were intellectually stimulating and satisfying. That, I think, is the important difference between working and middle class. Yes, in both cases I was working for someone else, but in the latter, I was much more engaged and secure.
@MikeDunnAuthor
This anarchist coming out with a clear Marxist description of reality.
However class is also, and rather unhelpfully, used to describe cultural characteristics and micro-distinctions within the proletariate, the bourgeoisie, the aristocracy and in those countries that still have it, the peasantry.

@markhburton

The 20th century sociologists' invention of class by profession (AB, C1, C2, etc) is equally pernicious. It's your relationship to assets that determines social class - not the job you do, your level of education, or your regional accent.

@MikeDunnAuthor

@GeofCox @markhburton

I would say your relationship to private property, the means of production, the ability to hire and fire people. But I think we're more or less on the same page

@MikeDunnAuthor yikes. Tfw you realize they let you in the house but still treat you differently. Wtf.
@MikeDunnAuthor I disagree. The middle class typically has both the transferable skills and financial resources to be able to walk away from an employer with only minimum consequences.