Tell me again how #GenAI will extract meaningful trends from and answer queries about your data set.

#chatgpt4o #fAIl

I can also see this going great for coding, programming languages and computers are known to be very forgiving and tolerant
@larsmb It's fantastic. Here's the FastGPT version of it. It greatly demonstrates that it doesn't have the ability to count / compute but only combines textual artefacts.

@theuni Oh, I wasn't actually aware that someone else had found this before! Nice. I had actually stumbled across it independently.

But it is very funny to me that this is the level of technology that certain people want to ram into everything and are burning 100+ Terawatt hours per year by now.

Sure, GPTs, LLMs, ML in general, very cool stuff. But also, as ready as a wet noodle.

@larsmb I think we can now consider LLMs the pool noodles of cloud or something.
@larsmb I wasn't either. I sometimes use FastGPT because it gives at least some indication of where it got its data from so I can go from there and look things up myself ...
@theuni @larsmb it might also just attribute stuff that kind of fits. At least that would the case if they are using a RAG like thing I think
@fl0_id @larsmb Which is fine by me. That's basically what a search engine does. FastGPT is done from a search engine perspective, so it's basically a bit of summarisation and then pointing you somewhere. It doesn't even do continued conversations.
@theuni @larsmb I know. But in my experience it is still often wrong. I’d prefer if Kari just focused on good search instead