What if voting wasn’t something you did to express your personal preference? What if it was something you did to protect the people you love?

I keep hearing people I know who I thought genuinely cared for the people on the ragged edges of US society saying that they’re not going to vote for Harris. I wish they’d see voting as a thing we do *for each other* instead of something that speaks to your own self-centered opinion.

It’s just moral narcissism - the idea that how it makes you feel about yourself is the most important thing. It’s wildly, WILDLY selfish. And these are the same people who lecture others about privilege.

Wild.

People say I shouldn’t shame others for not voting, but fuck that. We have this one lever we get to pull. This one task. If you can’t make that bare minimum requirement to participate in a democracy, I have no goddamn respect for you. You’re not more morally pure for opting out, you’re just a petulant child.

Voting isn’t everything, but it’s the first thing. If you have this right that so many fought and bled for and you don’t use it, shame on you.

And if you’re so radical that you’re willing to take up arms to fight fascism, but you’re not willing to cast a vote for someone who isn’t perfect, you’re no radical, you’re just a fucking poser.

@fraying

louder for the toxic idealists in the back:

if you don't #vote, you don't have morality, you have self congratulatory ego masturbation

belief without action is not morality. withholding action when the stakes are clear on things you *say* you care about is not highmindedness, it's impotency

one order out: not being aware of the stakes makes you absurdly clueless

and finally "both sides the same" is a moronic lie. i will consider you a russian troll for that in intellectual charity

@benroyce

Most just like the aesthetics of rebellion and violence... it's just another way of glorifying hatred and death for those you think are "bad" for society.

Doctor Who had a really good episode on this: "Truth or Consequences". The problem is not with wanting "revolution" it's that people aren't thinking about the after revolution. At a certain point, unless you just want 24/7/365 war and death (which a good portion do want), you need to become the person arguing against revolution and finding a way to incorporate other views. And then you're right back where you started, needing to vote. The only difference is how many people you killed and made suffer.

So, unless the goal is increasing that number, you vote.

#Politics #Philosophy #Revolution #BurnItAllDown #BIAD #DoctorWho #BBC #Rebellion #Violence #Death #Suffering #CivilWar #USPol #Europe #EU

@imstilljeremy

exactly

say those romanticizing revolution somehow live through the endless suffering death and injustice of an actual civil war

what appears on the other side?

well, as stakeholders in the glorious struggle, they get a voice in the decisions the new govt makes

that means they, uh, will vote?

setting aside those who think "no govt" is possible and the warlords that appear in the vacuum of power

and set aside those who want a left leaning totalitarian govt