Not a full #CrossBorderRail thread today as I’m not crossing any borders 🙂

But the Birdy is with me for the trip to Nantes via Dijon and Nevers

TER 91373
08:40 Nuits-sous-Ravières - Dijon Ville 09:27

SNCF for TER Mobigo BFC

114.64 km/h average
89.8 km
3 stops

Train type: Alstom Régiolis 6 carriages

Also a quick aside…

What’s with station names in France?

My Intercités later stops at St Pierre des Corps - a station on the edge of the city Tours, but Tours isn’t in the station name

Likewise Les Aubrais is on the edge of Orléans, but Orléans isn’t in the name

But they stuck Challes-les-Eaux (popn 5600) on the Chambéry station name although the station isn’t there

And three towns are named at Le Creusot TGV…

The information system on the TER Nuits-sous-Ravières to Dijon was broken

So I wasn’t once warned about gaps between trains and platforms, or to label my bags

And the world didn’t end! 🤯

TER 93011
09:54 Dijon (Ville?) - Nevers 12:19

SNCF for TER Mobigo BFC 88.18km/h
213.1km

9 stops

Bi-mode AGC train, electric first, diesel later. 4 carriages, 4 further carriages to Clermont Ferrand

Upsides of AGC trains (if you’re in the low floor section): massive windows

And the seats are comfortable

Downside: small wheels and no yaw dampers mean a pretty bumpy ride

We’ve now been warned that we can only get out once the train has stopped, and if there is a platform there

Given this is a modern train with centrally locked doors *being able to not respect that would require a staff error*

So announcements like this are for SNCF to legally cover themselves, not actually for any purpose for passengers

Ah

“Objet sur les voies” somewhere near Montchanin

Diverted into Chagny and stuck

Glad I’m on Interrail and can re-plan all of this 🙂

How to cross the tracks at Chagny

This is *totally safe*

Not

Ah that’s nice

I had to show a map to the train manager to explain to her what is and isn’t blocked here. At the very least SNCF could inform its staff where blockages are

“But freight takes a different route!”

Err no. Not here. Don’t talk shit.

I’ve ended up with a bigger railway organisation f*** up here in Bourgogne than I encountered in 4 weeks in the Balkans! 😀

A reasonable railway - like DB or ÖBB - would have told passengers for Nevers, Bourges etc - to go to Lyon, and held the Intercités there 10 mins for them. Or go via Paris on a TGV.

But that’s another part of SNCF (this is TER Bourgogne Franche Comté) so they can’t do that.

And there’s little spare capacity in the system *anyway* as everyone is so obsessed maximising yield on each train, so there’s no flex in case of disruption.

France has all the disadvantages of a liberalised railway and all the disadvantages of a state operated railway, and pretty much none of the upsides of either.
It’s like “ha ha, who the hell are you, sucker, you stooped to the level of taking a TER! You had it coming for you that it’d not work out. Like why would anyone in their right mind do that? Drive a car instead!”

And to those of you going “there’s a warning light” in response to the earlier toot: it doesn’t work

Safety conscious SNCF my arse

And the point here isn’t safety only, but consistency

A rail firm that warns you with audio messages not to open the doors all the time - when you can’t because they’re locked

BUT

Has a crossing like this with warning lights that don’t work and no staff

HAS A CONSISTENCY PROBLEM

Ah. Top quality.

Due to the disruption at Chagny the train is running in reverse order (first train Clermont, second train Nevers).

I help a Dutch couple who are hence in the wrong half of the train. They ask the station manager at Montchanin who’s NOT been told the train is in reverse order…

… and it turns out I’m right and the station manager is wrong.

Number of announcements to assist passengers: none.

“To travel on this train you must have a valid ticket”

FFS. Thanks for that.

Also to those going “France has a privatised rail system for long distance trains”, NO it doesn’t.

It has a state owned railway, but for long distance services it’s supposed to be at least cost neutral. That’s a very different thing to “private”.

I’m now finally on the move, heading towards Nevers about 90 mins late.

First stop: Le Creusot

No staff on platform. Train manager doesn’t step down onto platform. Signs on the train not working. So passengers don’t know what train this is pitching up at an odd time at the station.

Meanwhile on board the train manager hasn’t bothered with an announcement or explanation of any sort.

Oh yay. A tree falling on the track: not the responsibility of SNCF says the train manager. Isn’t there some responsibility to cut back trees?

Train manager radioing ahead about connections: not my responsibility says the train manager. “You have to go to the desk in Nevers!”

What the **** is your responsibility?

And I tried explaining that the Intercités Lyon - Nevers - Nantes is +80, my Dijon - Nevers is +90, and given there was 8 mins to change… it might help me and fellow passengers…

… but yeah, you guessed it. Not the train manager’s responsibility.

Ah. We’ve racked up more delay due to speed restrictions

I presume Bourgogne Franche Comté didn’t take responsibility to pay SNCF Réseau to take responsibility for its tracks

Also this situation isn’t dissimilar to last month in Slovenia where my Ljubljana - Celje was delayed meaning I’d miss a connection to Imeno

But there the train manager was proactive, worked out a solution to change in Grobelno instead, and I made it

Here today? 🤷‍♂️

I’ll get to Nantes eventually, but there are people here going much further. Will they I wonder?

And to top it all: train manager makes an announcement arriving in Nevers warning us that leaving luggage behind can lead to a fine, but no word of apology for 100 mins delay

Damn I hate French railways

Shit goes wrong. I get it. But show some solidarity with your damned passengers!

Also why did SNCF not electrify Chagny - Le Creusot (about 40km), and build connecting curves as shown with the arrows?

Doing so would
1) Speed up Strasbourg/Mulhouse/Besançon to Lyon/The South TGVs
2) Provide a diversion route for Dijon-Paris TGVs when there are works on the old Dijon-Les Laumes-Laroche line the TGVs take (closures there this autumn)

It’d even lessen the load on Dijon-Chalon s/ Saône-Maçon-Lyon that’s v full

@jon one of these announcement they are required to make or they get written off.
@jon you’re not exactly selling French rail travel atm 😂

@jon gosh does this train manager even know anything a train manager does?!

We're actually supposed to make a delay announcement as soon as we are 3mins behind!
And after a delay of 10mins, if I hadn't made an announcement yet, explaining why and that we're delayed, my customer would eat me alive!

Better send him over to me and I'll teach him 😅

@jon Crossing French regions is CrossBorderRail ;)
@tristramg it’s like crossing the effing desert.

@jon not that dissimilar to DB though. Last summer, my sister faced massive delays in ICEs on her way from Vienna, the last ICE on her rescheduled journey (from Leipzig to Munchen IIRC) was delayed like by 2 hours. Plenty of passengers, including her, were going to Kassel, they had tickets with change in Bad Hersfeld IIRC, but ICE with all the delays was projected to arrive at Bad Hersfeld simultaneously with the departure of the last (Kassel-bound RE) other train this day, from the opposite track on the same platform.
They all (there were like 20 people) talked to the ICE train manager, train manager said that there is no problem, that they'll definitely be able to catch that RE.
So they exited the ICE in Bad Hersfeld, but it was delayed by two more minutes, so RE already departed, right on schedule. And as they were trying to figure things out, ICE departed too, leaving them at that small town at night, with no other trains from that station for the next five hours.

(Luckily those who decided to not look for a hotel were able to find a taxi company and wake up a driver and get to Kassel after all, and luckily DB compensated the (very high) taxi bill. But still this would not have happened if reason manager did something DB held that RE there for just a few minutes. I was later told that that's impossible because RE is operated by DB regio which is a different entity... but that's the same excuse as in France, and also the train manager could have at least said that, instead of assuring everybody that they'll definitely get to Kassel if they exit the train in Bad Hersfeld.)

@IngaLovinde sure it can happen in Germany too (and theoretically DB has a digital system to assess situations like this). But this train manager wasn’t even willing to listen to the idea he could do something.
@jon yeah I mean that ICE train manager clearly wasn't willing to listen either, it's just that on the surface he demonstrated it not with "I don't care, not my responsibility" but with "don't worry, everything's going to be fine" (and not doing anything of substance, just as his SNCF counterpart).
Which does keep the passengers' mood up, but only for a short while (as long as they're on the same train with this manager), and does not actually solve the problem.
@jon when I was young ™️, the train manager in the delayed Corail went to every passenger and asked for connections, and then radioed to Dijon and instructed for the TER to wait. In similar times they even once stopped the TGV Lyria (from Lausanne if I remember correctly) in Les-Laumes because the last TER of the day would not wait for one Passenger (my dad) going there. What a downfall SNCF made in the past 20 years - amazing!
@orangerkater SŽ in Slovenia did exactly that last month in Grobelno for me - an extra stop on the international train.
@jon for us in Maribor two years ago. The train manager even rushed to the other platform and made sure that they waited for us as we had to use the extremely slow elevators with the stroller. What a service!
@jon meanehile, ÖBB, when stuff are falling on the tracks:
@jon Maybe too busy checking bag for proper labelling…
@jon What do we want? A nanny or a Darwin state? No risk, no fun! 🙂
@cdamian I want a railway that’s consistent. I want a rail firm that warns me of risks because they’re risks, not because they’re doing so to cover their own arses.
@jon i would actually know how the warning works, the situation in the picture, without any further context, does not necessarily imply a failure though
@pony well the train departed and there was no light and no staff.
@jon that would be somewhat concerning

but like genuinely, what is that sign for? i assume it's to be used when you have a train path on the tracks so you don't have to stop or slow down in front of the crossing
@jon There is a barrier, even attached with a chain. And the guardrail prevents you from running into the sign post. Looks perfectly safe to me.
@jon why it looks like there's signalization
@jon But of course it's safe. They painted yellow stripes! Safety completely assured.
@jon I'm unreasonably mad about the stripes not being symmetrical.
@jon Central locking systems can, and sometimes do, fail. I do remember an incident with Dutch Railways having to announce that people should stay from the balconies because there was a central locking system failure. That was decades ago and now they probably would just cancel that particular service instead of going on.
@whvholst so announce when it fails then! Not all the damned time.
@jon Oh, wow, on every train?
@whvholst @jon Yeah I think as Jon said this is for legal purposes. They were deemed liable in court when some young people decided to go wild on a train and hurt themselves. Civil law students in France probably all know he case ;)
@whvholst @jon Note it's still stupid and don't think it would change their liability