Technology is political.

If your project or organisation has a “no politics” clause, you’re saying you’re happy to exclude people whose very existence is political in our societies.

It’s only defensible if you’re coming from a place of privilege where the dominant politics are to your advantage so you can take them as given.

There is no such thing as “no politics”; there is only “no politics other than the politics of the status quo that I benefit from, which I’ve internalised as normal.”

@aral Reminds me of the people who say "I'm not political".
Yes they are, their politics are just (percieved by them as) the default.
@aral 99.9999% of no politics clauses actually mean, we are out and out fascists but you are not allowed to comment on that as you build improved IBM Punch Cards for their concentration camps.

@aral Everything is political, it's one of the facets that most man-made things have.

Why does the US and Japan have the same outlets? Taiwan too? And the power standard is mostly the same? 🤔

Why do TVs scan left to right? Does it have anything to do with how English is written? 🤔

@MontgomeryGator @aral huh. I’ve learned something today. I always thought they scanned top down
@MxVerda @aral What's weird, is that the scanning pattern could be really strange but work. There's a kids movie called Planet 51 where the aliens still use CRTs, and they scan in a spiral inside out. Thing is, round CRTs were a thing in oscilloscopes, and there were even round screened TVs (they were a gimmick mostly). Oscilloscopes don't really scan, and the round tubed TVs scanned as a square but there's nothing preventing that scan pattern that could be round and scan outward like in that kids movie.
@MxVerda CRTs scan a line left to right, then the next line, etc, and the lines go top to bottom.

@MontgomeryGator @aral
@MontgomeryGator @aral What does it have to do with politics that TVs scan from left to right? It just says that the inventor probably comes from a country where you read from left to right. But that’s not political.

@aral
Let me give you the other side: I suspect that the developer here wants to code with the least amount of noise. Such an issue with lots of noise from non-contributors does not help.

Feedback from users and/or developers that this bothers them is useful. Polite feedback as to why it matters to potential contributors may also help.

Lots of noise only serves to have the developer dig in further.

@tzafrir @aral guess you also apolitical cause you dgaf.

@aral This is true. No politics is only possible from a position of privilege

Still, people do sometimes get tired of politics. And their internal motivations for doing things often exclude politics

I've often said that #woke is the greatest ideology of all, but at the same time it is also so incredibly difficult that no person in this world can pull it off all the time

This is why I call for wisdom, and compassion for those who cannot see their own error. Turning them against woke is worse!

@gimulnautti @aral Maybe partisan politics for the sake of party ideology and blind loyalty to that party is tiresome? I think people need to be able to talk politics and discuss policies that affect their lives.
@aral aka "news flash: black and white statements usually have grey areas".
@aral This is exactly what I discovered when I looking into the SerenityOS issue. The PR to change "he" to "they" was shot down citing "no politics".
https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/pull/6814#issuecomment-830793992
And then there's also the Helldivers thing about not wanting to make cloaks themed around the tranz flag colors.
Heck, this "no politics" card seems pretty easy to use when you just want to ignore the existence of queer or non-cisgender people, as if there existence is political.
Gender neutral language within build instructions by Tunas1337 · Pull Request #6814 · SerenityOS/serenity

It's a minor nitpick, but I think it's important; assuming the user and/or developer of the operating system is male isn't exactly the best.

GitHub

@livingcoder @aral

"they" doesn't really makes sense there. It should be "it", right? The pronoun refers to the user "anon", that is not a representation of a person.

@tzafrir @aral The word "he" was a reference to a person, the user, so "they" is appropriate.

@aral Alternatively "no politics" could actually mean straight up that at no point no political discussions, opinions or anything is allowed within the spaces of the community. "No politics" combined with an absolute "no discrimination" clause is exactly what I think most communities should adopt.

(Anyone can feel free to reply to share their opinion.)

@aral My teenage daughter told me she’s “not into politics” — which is hilarious because she lives in the SF Bay Area and just doesn’t realize what politics is.

I asked her if she thought her friends should be able to choose their pronouns.

“Well, that’s just being kind, not politics.”

@stanley @aral
Some things certainly *shouldn't* be political, but that is a political statement in and of itself.
@stanley @aral
I guess it boils down to the question what do we mean with politics. And I guess those who say they are not into politics define it as whatever politicians do at their job.

@aral
Like the old saying goes:

There are two races - white and political.

There are two sexual preferences - straight and political.

There are two genders - men and political.

@aral any time more than two people interact you have politics. . .
@aral Is that about #ladybird?😏
@OddDev 👍
@aral @OddDev have they said something stupid already?
@jono @aral They do not accept grammatical corrections because they think its pushing a political agenda. And went that far to add this to their contribution guidelines.
@OddDev @aral thank you, and oh that is uncool.

@aral Female hair is either long or political. Sexual orientation is either heterosexual or political. Gender identity is either cis or political. Clothing is either gender stereotyped and boring or political. City infrastructure is either car-focused or political. Energy is either fossil fuels or political. Education is either white christian propaganda or political.

Everything follows the same pattern, tech included.

@dawngreeter @aral
It's almost as if "political" is code-word for "I don't want to talk about it because it makes me uncomfortable and could lead to conflict, and no one ever taught me how to resolve conflict peacefully, so I'm just going to ignore it "
@ix9 @dawngreeter @aral no, it's not about feelings, it's about power. What "I" want is non-political and therefore must be right; what "you" want is "political" and therefore wrong.

@ix9 @robparsons @aral @dawngreeter Conflict is about nothing but power: allow the powers-that-be to enforce the status quo that they are happy with; and - voila! - no conflict!

Conflict can also be avoided or addressed in other ways; but those involve work from the aforementioned powers, & sometimes even change 😱😱

@ix9 @dawngreeter @aral

A powerful and effective weapon used by opponents of change is discomfort. Opposition to equality for gay men has the easiest access to this. All anyone has to do in order to make everyone in the room want to talk about something else is say, "We don't want someone's agenda shoved down our throats."

Funny how that metaphor comes up every single time, but almost never for any other issue, eh?

@Professor_Stevens @ix9 @dawngreeter @aral I wonder how many homophobes pay NSFW artists for that
@Professor_Stevens @ix9 @dawngreeter @aral
That's a very good point, and I don't think I've ever wondered about the implications/connotations of that metaphor.
@Professor_Stevens @ix9 @dawngreeter @aral I just appreciate how they compare all my actions to a good blow job.
@Professor_Stevens @dawngreeter @aral Yup. It's frustrating. Wanting to live life with the same freedoms and privileges as everyone else is not an agenda. Project 2025 is an agenda.
@ix9 @dawngreeter @aral (omg yes I need this on a hoodie or booty shorts)
Custom Shorts, Personalized Athletic Shorts & Booty Shorts | Customized Girl

Use our design center to personalize these shorts with your own text and art. Compression, Running, and other shorts.

@MxVerda @dawngreeter @aral Absolutely! I'd give you my real life name and title to include if i knew how to DM on Masta. But i don't.
@ix9 @dawngreeter @aral or it is because internet forums - particularly social media with their algorithms and unique dynamics - don't exactly yield themselves for healthy discussion and instead reward rage bait and toxicity.
@ix9 @dawngreeter @aral particularly FOSS projects with no commercial backers already struggle with keeping the lights on (and there's been enough security issues stemming from that). moderating off nazi shitstorms, inter-leftie dogpiles and dealing with real-world abuse (swatting, doxxing, pizza deliveries, ...) can be goddamn exhausting, and I understand *everyone* just saying "fuck all of this" as a result.
@ix9 @dawngreeter @aral i've had to deal with nazi death threats in my mailbox too often to count. i got the resources/privileges to say "ok no big deal", but many other people (particularly in the US, where you can be fired on a whim if some people decide to target your employer!) just don't have this protection that I have here in Europe with decent workplace regulations.

@diebarschlampe @ix9 @aral I feel like there's room to discuss approaches to moderation as separate from the "no politics" bullshit.

Cryptofascists have very successfully weaponized "no politics, please" approach as both a way to shut down even basic recognition that various minorities exist AND as a way to make shouting "kill all trans people" somehow equally political as a game having a character that is trans.

@dawngreeter @ix9 @aral as said it's not just about moderation - that's just the most public-facing part. the real problem is that society hasn't found a way to deal with the extreme level of destruction that nazi (or other, see the issues on both sides of the current Israel/Palestine conflict) trolls can cause. as a project, you and *everyone involved* have to be privileged enough to say anything but "no politics at all".
@dawngreeter @ix9 @aral we live in times where even doing something as reasonable as saying "we support trans people" can get people's door bashed in by SWAT units, or that excludes people in countries with LGBT-hostile politics from participating (e.g. Russians or people in many African / Arabic countries with very strict "propaganda" laws on the books).
@dawngreeter @ix9 @aral i'm not sure there even *exists* a solution to that problem. no matter what path one chooses, there will always be someone left to deal with the mess.

@diebarschlampe @ix9 @aral I hear you. You're not wrong that it is a problem. I certainly don't have a blanket working solution.

But, if taken at face value, this argument literally circles right back to nazis wanting to kill trans people is equal to trans people existing.

And just to be super clear, I am in no way saying this is your point. It is just what "no politics" always amounts to. Though I certainly wouldn't fault anyone for not wanting to be the person adjudicating that online.

@diebarschlampe @dawngreeter @aral this is a scary thought. I live in a country/state where this isn't currently a concern, but I'm well aware that this current reality isn't guaranteed in the future and is a luxury that everyone should have.
@ix9 @dawngreeter @aral Charitably, sometimes it's an unexamined "I don't think this effects me because it only effects me positively" with some resentment attached because they nevertheless feel like they could lose something. (still problematic, possibly easier to deal with though)
@blagh @dawngreeter @aral For people that take no action to avoid political discussions, maybe. But there are a lot of people who will turn their head and run the other way. I've literally been at parties where a political topic of discussion comes up, and a person leaves the conversation saying, "oh, I don't do politics."
@ix9 @dawngreeter @aral almost for sure the more common thing!
@dawngreeter @aral food is either meat or political