Technology is political.

If your project or organisation has a “no politics” clause, you’re saying you’re happy to exclude people whose very existence is political in our societies.

It’s only defensible if you’re coming from a place of privilege where the dominant politics are to your advantage so you can take them as given.

There is no such thing as “no politics”; there is only “no politics other than the politics of the status quo that I benefit from, which I’ve internalised as normal.”

@aral This is exactly what I discovered when I looking into the SerenityOS issue. The PR to change "he" to "they" was shot down citing "no politics".
https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/pull/6814#issuecomment-830793992
And then there's also the Helldivers thing about not wanting to make cloaks themed around the tranz flag colors.
Heck, this "no politics" card seems pretty easy to use when you just want to ignore the existence of queer or non-cisgender people, as if there existence is political.
Gender neutral language within build instructions by Tunas1337 · Pull Request #6814 · SerenityOS/serenity

It's a minor nitpick, but I think it's important; assuming the user and/or developer of the operating system is male isn't exactly the best.

GitHub

@livingcoder @aral

"they" doesn't really makes sense there. It should be "it", right? The pronoun refers to the user "anon", that is not a representation of a person.

@tzafrir @aral The word "he" was a reference to a person, the user, so "they" is appropriate.