Teri KanefieldJul 2, 2024

Well.

@StephanieJones is on a roll. Instead of reposting each of her substack pieces, I'll just send you here:
https://stephaniejones2.substack.com

I've mentioned Stephanie a few times. I've tried to get her to be more active here, but she really doesn't do much on social media.

Adding: She is very accomplished. There is no room here for her resume. Among other things she served on the Congressional committee investigating the J6 attack.

Stephanie’s Substack | Stephanie Jones | Substack

My personal Substack. Click to read Stephanie’s Substack, by Stephanie Jones, a Substack publication. Launched 6 months ago.

Show threadBalinaresJul 2, 2024

@Teri_Kanefield Thanks, those articles are 100% on point!

Do you perchance have good sources going into how bad yesterday's ruling is, what it really says and what it doesn't? I've been struggling to tell facts from punditry.

Show threadM. Tullius Cicero
@Teri_Kanefield @balinares I would recommend going straight to the source and reading Sotomayor’s dissent. Even if you have trouble following the legalese sections in the middle, which spell out in detail exactly why the majority’s reasoning is spurious and unconstitutional, Sections I through III and Section VII (the closing section) should tell you what you need to know. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
Jul 2, 2024 at 9:21pmWeb
Show threadBalinaresJul 3, 2024
@TulliusCicero43 That's a very good idea actually, thank you for the suggestion!