OpenAI stealing Scarlett’s voice for their new product after being told “no” is so perfectly on-brand, it’s almost painful. https://www.npr.org/2024/05/20/1252495087/openai-pulls-ai-voice-that-was-compared-to-scarlett-johansson-in-the-movie-her

@Meyerweb This part of the article is kinda suss

“Just two days before the new ChatGPT was unveiled, Altman again reached out to Johansson's team, urging the actress to reconsider, she said. But before she and Altman could connect, the company publicly announced its new product.”

@Meyerweb Its hilarious that the response from OpenAI was "The real voice actress goes to another school."
@Meyerweb some guys have a problem with consent

@Meyerweb I agree but "stealing" is very misleading here. She didn't do any work here nor is the voice that similar.

More like inspired without permission. Shitty move but you'll never find me cheering for ultra rich entertainer's copyrights in this lifetime.

@wraptile @Meyerweb I'll take the ultra rich entertainer over the megacorp every day of the week.
@wraptile Right, because there exists no recording of her voice that they could have had access to.
@oscherler doesn't matter. That's not what stealing means.
@wraptile Ah, you’re one of those “piracy isn’t stealing, because you still have your digital file” smartasses?
@oscherler no just someone who knows more than 1 word

@wraptile It’s not enough to know words, you need to know how they’re put together.

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/misappropriation-of-personal-image-and-possible-remedies-46776

@oscherler your corporate law links are cute lmao have a good day 👋
@Meyerweb being to no and then doing it anyhow
@Meyerweb
I've often wondered why celebs don't copyright their likeness, visual and audio. Is it not legit to do this?
@godzero @Meyerweb it is not. There is a separate, common law intellectual property regime called the right of publicity which covers stuff like this.
@godzero @Meyerweb It wasn't necessary before AI. You either had exactness which required contribution from the celebrity, or you had imitation by others, which was clearly just approximation and fell under the umbrella of art. I think people are still protected against AI via the current laws, but courts may disagree.

@godzero @Meyerweb There is something called “publicity rights” or “personality rights,” and they vary from country to country or in the USA, from state to state.

Just to be precise, copyright wouldn’t apply here: copyright covers “the expression of an idea,” not a person’s physical characteristics.

@Meyerweb

Tech bros genuinely believe they live in a world where women aren't permitted to say no.

@Meyerweb Apparently their AI didn’t disguise the source of the voice well enough.

This is what 'opting out' means: them insisting it was just a coincidence that their stuff looks or sounds like yours.

@Meyerweb

@Meyerweb OpenAI: "our Charter will guide us in acting in the best interests of humanity" https://openai.com/charter/ 😏
OpenAI Charter

Our Charter describes the principles we use to execute on OpenAI’s mission.

@Meyerweb They have disabled it now.

@Meyerweb

did they seriously try "you don't know her, she goes to another school" as a defense? 🤣

@Meyerweb My theory: they already had it trained. Then figured it would probably be better to ask for permission. After they got told no, they just decided to fuck around and find out.
@Meyerweb so OpenAI is now basically the tentacle witch from the little mermaid?
@Meyerweb No rules remain. 2024
@Meyerweb I don’t think there’s anything wrong here. Since Johansson didn’t feel like doing it, OpenAI just found another actress with a similar voice to do it (if that’s what really happened). I mean, Johansson does not have rights over all voices that sound like hers.
@zaku @Meyerweb Good example of sophistry there.