2020: Microsoft sets goal to be carbon negative by end of the decade.

2023: Microsoft's emissions are 30% higher than in 2020.

Main cause? The relentless push to meet AI demand, which requires new data centers built out of carbon-intensive steel, cement, chips.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-15/microsoft-s-ai-investment-imperils-climate-goal-as-emissions-jump-30

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

@akshatrathi CDR will save them. 🙃

@akshatrathi
More than 96% of Microsoft's emissions are Scope 3 though which is better than most corporations.

Microsoft contracted 1,443,981 metric tons of carbon removal in FY22. They also made first-of-their kind multi-year forward offtake commitments to carbon removal, which could serve as a model for scaling the nascent carbon capture industry.

@GreenFire @akshatrathi And then there's this: https://www.reuters.com/technology/microsoft-buy-power-nuclear-fusion-company-helion-2023-05-10/

I didn't have "software megacorproation gets into the nuclear fusion game" on my bingo card, but I guess that's what's up.

Microsoft signs power purchase deal with nuclear fusion company Helion

Private U.S. nuclear fusion company Helion Energy will provide Microsoft <a href="https://www.reuters.com/companies/MSFT.O/"target="_blank">(MSFT.O)</a> with electricity in about five years, the companies said on Wednesday, in the first such deal for the power source that fuels the sun but has been elusive on Earth.

Reuters

@GreenFire @akshatrathi The same is likely true of almost all software/services companies: because of the way scopes are defined, almost all of their emissions are in Scope 3. Microsoft is no different there.

Assuming that graph is net emissions, this means their emissions have grown *despite* some amount of carbon removal or accounting.

@pwithnall @akshatrathi
Yes, possibly their emissions have grown from their suppliers or their accounting for emissions is getting more accurate as they have more experience and expertise from being one of the early adopters of trying to do it. I don't know which.

It's better that they're doing it anyways, which is better than almost any other company and that's what makes attacking them for publishing them so bad since that encourages more companies to not report them at all.

@akshatrathi Microsoft: "Just you wait!"
@akshatrathi We are currently solving the climate collapse by accelerating it.

@akshatrathi

but President Brad Smith says the good AI can do for the world will outweigh its environmental impact.

@kunev @akshatrathi in which world will ai do good if you've already destroyed ours
@akshatrathi that predicted line, straight down to zero. They must have spent thousands to model the process in such a complex way. Or maybe it was just PR bullsh*t...
@akshatrathi how do we get out of debt and build economy, boil the planet
@akshatrathi
2028: Microsoft asks the AI how to reduce emissions.
@akshatrathi there is no AI demand. That is artificial one to push products which will fail, hard.
@akshatrathi AI is gonna kill humanity, but not in the way we thought. #SlowBoiledFrog
@akshatrathi What a bunch of hot air
@akshatrathi the title on the link preview seems appropriate
@akshatrathi So progressive their carbon budgets are in 2027 already

@akshatrathi

We should never take big tech's "greenwashing" seriously. Ever.

@akshatrathi
The goal must be, using the internet instead driving.

Animal existence emitted carbon dioxide.

@akshatrathi I'm kind of hoping the scenario laid out here turns out to be true, that the improvments in LLM capabilities with more training are about to level off: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDUC-LqVrPU

If that happens then I think for companies to make more money off it they'll have to figure out how to make it more efficient and less expensive rather than just expanding and expanding.
Has Generative AI Already Peaked? - Computerphile

YouTube

@akshatrathi

Shhh, don't confront corporate greenwashing with reality!

@randomvangloboii @akshatrathi If they were serious they would extend Windows 10 support, or port Windows 11 to older machines. Preferably the former, because Windows 10 is better than 11.

Causing the unnecessary replacement of working equipment is the most un-green thing the tech industry does, and they need to be beaten over the head with that fact. Where are the climate protesters outside Microsoft and Google offices?

@mike805 @akshatrathi If they had to chase every single company that paints their packages with some green, they'd have no time at all
@akshatrathi main cause is stupid bing chatbotting away as soon as you scroll around
Concrete

Concrete is among the world’s most consumed materials—second only to water. It also produces large amounts of heat-trapping greenhouse gases.

MIT Climate Portal

@akshatrathi Microsoft (and Zoom etc) are companies in one of the few industries that is probably better off with a 2020 vs 2019 baseline for carbon reductions.

A lot of heavy industry and petchem majors are using 2019 as their benchmark year so they don't have to explain an immediate jump up (back to mean) from 2020 for their operations.

@akshatrathi @burgerdrome it just makes me so sad to think we might be risking the only world we have to power up quite possibly the dumbest series of tech products ever

@akshatrathi And instead of actually integrating AI in any ways that people will care to use, they simply add a built-in Windows app that can't even properly use system functions, (Copilot) search summaries that take up too much space and only appear when you *don't* want them, and weakly integrate it into Office apps with barely any useful functionality, but a whole lot more server calls.

Guys, just make chatbot interfaces. If I have a question, I'll ask. No annoying popups or bad features.

@akshatrathi

Then you dont find a shortcut, _you_ build solar and wind installations. Build the sun and wind microsoft, dont go buy some credit, BUILD THE POWER. BE ADULT. BE RESPONSIBLE. SEE THE WORLD.

@akshatrathi, but they need that AI money to buy carbon offsets!
@akshatrathi what AI “demand”? I didn’t demand any of this, leave me alone with your 8 copilots -.-

@akshatrathi How to be a BigTech company:

  • Make promise commiting to ethical/environmental plan.
  • Wait a few years for people to forget about it
  • Profit.
  • @akshatrathi not surprised; capitalistic monopolies always find a way to deceive the public such as greenwashing

    the data on that graph is the visual depiction of saying that "you'll quit drinking by 2050", then continuing to increase that habit by tenfold

    @akshatrathi @mogul Oh, sure. We burned away the redwoods, but we did it so that we could power machines to lie to us