HOW DID WE GET HERE?
(a thread of threads, quotes, and links)

This is a collection of writings and research concerned with how we got where we are today, which is in fact the story of what has been done *to* us, and what has been *taken from us*.

By "us" we're talking about "the 99%", "workers", "wage slaves", all non-owners of private property, "the poor", unhoused people, indigenous people, even plenty of people who swear by capitalism and identify as "capitalist" yet have no capital of their own and no serious hope of ever having any worth speaking of. In other words almost everyone except for the very few who have had the power to exploit us and shape our lives to serve their agenda. We're going to examine institutions and concepts that have deeply altered our world at all levels, both our external and internal realities.

By "here" we are talking about climate crisis and myriad other environmental catastrophes resulting from hyper-excessive extraction, consumption and waste; a world of rampant inequality, exploitation and oppression, hunger and starvation, genocide and war; a world of fences, walls, gatekeepers, prisons, police, bullshit jobs and criminalized poverty; a world overrun with cars and preventable disease; a world of vanishing biodiversity and thriving fascism; a world where "democracy" results in being led by some of the worst of humanity; a world ruled by an imaginary but all-powerful and single-minded god: Capital.

Our inspiration and structural framework for this survey is this quote from "The Prehistory of Private Property", an important work from political philosopher Karl Widerquist and anthropologist Grant S. McCall:

"After hundreds of millennia in which all humans had direct access to the commons, it took only a few centuries for enclosure, colonialism, capitalism, and industrialization to cut off the vast majority of people on Earth from direct access to the means of economic production and therefore to rob them of the power to say no. It took only a few generations to convince most people that this situation was natural and inevitable. That false lesson needs to be unlearned."

https://widerquist.com/books-3/#2b

Also recommended: "Prehistoric Myths in Modern Political Philosophy"

https://widerquist.com/books-3/#4b

#capitalism #colonialism #enclosure #PrivateProperty #state #police #inequality #anthropology #environment #ClimateCrisis #economics

1/30

A big part of this false lesson is the fantasized history that serves as its foundation; the stories we've been told and the assumptions we've been conditioned with.

To introduce us to "A new understanding of human history and the roots of inequality" here is the TED talk by archaeologist David Wengrow (link includes transcript):

https://www.ted.com/talks/david_wengrow_a_new_understanding_of_human_history_and_the_roots_of_inequality/transcript?language=en

2/30

David Wengrow: A new understanding of human history and the roots of inequality

TED

To explore this new understanding further here is a more detailed look at the stories we've been told and who has been telling them (this one is a longish read, dive in if you find it interesting, otherwise don't get bogged down here, move on to the next post!):

"How to change the course of human history (at least, the part that’s already happened)"
by anthropologist David Graeber and David Wengrow:

https://www.eurozine.com/change-course-human-history/

3/30

Understanding the state of things requires us to understand The State. Here's a crash course:

What Is The State? A helpful thread from @HeavenlyPossum
https://kolektiva.social/@HeavenlyPossum/113034394722266469

The State, Our Ancient Enemy
https://www.thecommoner.org.uk/the-state-our-ancient-enemy/

The State as Sole Capitalist
https://archive.ph/7uRGy

Here is another aspect of state, and another example of accepted narratives that need to be questioned in light of actual evidence. It turns out we can probably thank state for #patriarchy:

How did patriarchy actually begin?
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20230525-how-did-patriarchy-actually-begin

More info about roles of men and women in past societies:

Shattering the myth of men as hunters and women as gatherers
https://phys.org/news/2023-06-shattering-myth-men-hunters-women.html

Worldwide survey kills the myth of ‘Man the Hunter’
https://www.science.org/content/article/worldwide-survey-kills-myth-man-hunter

Iron Age DNA Reveals Women Dominated Pre-Roman Britain
https://www.sciencealert.com/iron-age-dna-reveals-women-dominated-pre-roman-britain

4/30

HeavenlyPossum (@[email protected])

Thread: What Is The State? I thought it would be a good idea to explain what I mean by “the state,” because quite a few people seem confused by this. Thought it is lengthy, I don’t mean for this to be a definitive statement, and I’m sure plenty of anarchists will disagree with some or many of my points. I also don’t mean for this to be a comprehensive discourse on state-ness, but rather a general statement about my personal perspective. 1/13

kolektiva.social
The State as enemy is a problematic narrative, because then what do you call it when people work together and cooperate? That's not a state? That is why state propaganda actively attacks the state, because if you avoid cooperation for fear of it being oppression, then the organized state can oppress you without anyone else interfering. It's not their business after all!

If you believe that a state is neccessarily an oppressive regime, then you can never form an egalitarian state, leaving you easy pickings for authoritarians.

@cy @RD4Anarchy

The state is not a synonym for “when people work together and cooperate.” If that’s how you’re using it, then I assure you that you’re referring to something other than what anarchists are referring to when they use that term.

I just don't want to have to read Kropotkin to understand that means "Community investigators good, police bad."

@cy

That’s fine! But it’s silly to accuse an anarchist of opposing cooperation or being vulnerable to manipulation by authority because they’re using a term differently than you are.

Ha if I was accusing them of that, I'd declare they were only pretending to be anarchist, and were deliberately using upsetting and unactionable language to aid authoritarians, by making us act like big angry babies demanding incoherent extremes, and not helping each other. But I'm sure they're just frustrated by some craven centrists trying to get us to shake hands with Nazis again.

@cy

What are you talking about