Hello @copernicus_org, I am curious about the ESSD "LD" (Living Data) publication process.

https://www.earth-system-science-data.net/living_data_process.html

Are there examples of such "LD" papers already that you could point me to?
@ESSD_journal @mankoff

ESSD - Living data process

@lavergnetho @copernicus_org @ESSD_journal

There are a few example. Global carbon budget, global methane budget, IPCC "indactors of global change" https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2295-2023 . My @mankoff 2019, and both 2020 papers have continually (daily!) updating data, but no change big enough to warrant a new paper yet. We're working on a big update that will come with a paper.

Indicators of Global Climate Change 2022: annual update of large-scale indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence

Abstract. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments are the trusted source of scientific evidence for climate negotiations taking place under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), including the first global stocktake under the Paris Agreement that will conclude at COP28 in December 2023. Evidence-based decision-making needs to be informed by up-to-date and timely information on key indicators of the state of the climate system and of the human influence on the global climate system. However, successive IPCC reports are published at intervals of 5–10 years, creating potential for an information gap between report cycles. We follow methods as close as possible to those used in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Working Group One (WGI) report. We compile monitoring datasets to produce estimates for key climate indicators related to forcing of the climate system: emissions of greenhouse gases and short-lived climate forcers, greenhouse gas concentrations, radiative forcing, surface temperature changes, the Earth's energy imbalance, warming attributed to human activities, the remaining carbon budget, and estimates of global temperature extremes. The purpose of this effort, grounded in an open data, open science approach, is to make annually updated reliable global climate indicators available in the public domain (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8000192, Smith et al., 2023a). As they are traceable to IPCC report methods, they can be trusted by all parties involved in UNFCCC negotiations and help convey wider understanding of the latest knowledge of the climate system and its direction of travel. The indicators show that human-induced warming reached 1.14 [0.9 to 1.4] ∘C averaged over the 2013–2022 decade and 1.26 [1.0 to 1.6] ∘C in 2022. Over the 2013–2022 period, human-induced warming has been increasing at an unprecedented rate of over 0.2 ∘C per decade. This high rate of warming is caused by a combination of greenhouse gas emissions being at an all-time high of 54 ± 5.3 GtCO2e over the last decade, as well as reductions in the strength of aerosol cooling. Despite this, there is evidence that increases in greenhouse gas emissions have slowed, and depending on societal choices, a continued series of these annual updates over the critical 2020s decade could track a change of direction for human influence on climate.

@lavergnetho @copernicus_org @ESSD_journal

For smaller products than the Global X budget" papers, we'd expect a non-trivial change to warrant a new paper. Something in the inputs, processing pipeline, methods, etc. that updates the data product sufficiently that a new paper should describe it.

Feel free to ask specific questions for your use case here or via email.

Thanks @mankoff.

Specifically, we are thinking of producing an extension (3-4 more years) to the @osi_saf sea-ice drift #ClimateData Record published in #ESSD as https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5807-2023.

Same processing chain, (almost) same input data. The extension data would have own #doi. And we would of course run a validation against buoy data.

My question: does this fall into the ESSD LD category, or is it not even worth a paper? We would probably not invest in a whole new paper.

@ESSD_journal

A climate data record of year-round global sea-ice drift from the EUMETSAT Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI SAF)

Abstract. Sea ice in the polar regions can move several tens of kilometres per day under the actions of winds, ocean currents, and internal stresses. Long-term observations of the rate and patterns of this motion are needed to characterize the full response of the polar environment to climate change. Here, we introduce a new climate data record (CDR) of year-round, global, daily sea-ice drift vectors covering 1991–2020. The motion vectors are computed from series of passive microwave imagery in the winter months and from a parametric free-drift model in the summer months. An evaluation against on-ice buoy trajectories reveals that the RMSEs of the sea-ice drift CDR are small and vary with hemisphere and seasons (2.1 km for Arctic winters, 2.6 km for Arctic summer, 3 to 4 km for the Antarctic sea ice). The CDR is un-biased for Arctic winter conditions. The bias is larger for Antarctic and for summer sea-ice motion. The CDR consists of daily product files holding the dX and dY components of the drift vectors on an Equal-Area Scalable Earth (EASE2) grid with 75 km spacing as well as associated uncertainties and flags. It is prepared in the context of the EUMETSAT Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI SAF) and is readily available at https://doi.org/10.15770/EUM_SAF_OSI_0012 (OSI SAF, 2022).

@lavergnetho

@osi_saf @ESSD_journal

Same processing chain and same results - I wouldn't recommend a new paper.

@mankoff @osi_saf @ESSD_journal

Thanks. On the other hand, these are 4 additional years of satellite data, and how they validate. Can be of interest to a user / reader.

I would also usually not write a new paper (too much work), but the question was if ESSD LD was facilitating exactly that type of dataset update.

@lavergnetho

@osi_saf @ESSD_journal

If they don't validate, that's interesting, and I'd be happy to see an updated paper.