@scottfgray It's crazy how people don't understand that AI is a tool, not a "get out of work" free card.
I use chatgpt for helping me in programming when I get stuck, but I don't just copy and paste code from it or tell it "Write me the whole program" lol
@charadon @scottfgray And even that is dicey, given the phenomenal amount of illegally obtained and processed work that was used for the AI and where the code you ingest into ChatGPT goes (in case of proprietary software you work on). Not to mention the ethical aspects.
The only model I'd ever consider using for anything important is a self-hosted one that went all and above to ensure ethically correct training data and is open source. Something like Mistral-7B but more ethical (I guess).
@feliks @Natanox @charadon @scottfgray Ethical training data won't help the problem described here - prompt "engineers" cannot tweak images or prose based on specific feedback.
You can' fix a massive Dunning Kruger machine that doesn't know its limitations.
@feliks @Natanox @charadon @scottfgray
The company displaying the licence of the works they used to train their pile of linear algebra. That is the only proof
@feliks @Natanox @charadon @scottfgray
I don't care about competitive. Stealing money is very profitable and competitive too. It does not mean I appreciate people getting mugged. Art is pretty expensive, it is a time consuming prospect, and so it programming, and so is writing...
The work of artists and programmers is being used and processed into other works without abiding to the licenses set for transformative work, which AI output definitely is at the very least
@feliks @Natanox @charadon @scottfgray
Hardly feasible? Tusky, an open-source and free app for Fediverse, lists 20ish licenses of the code they used. Not only is it feasible, but by law as written it is required.
@feliks @Natanox @charadon @scottfgray
Google Classrooms lists hundreds of licenses of the code from open source project they used. It is feasible and required. Credit must be given where it is due.
@feliks @Natanox @charadon @scottfgray
Untagged images should always assume to be protected. Images with licenses should they be collated in a model should remain protected under their same license. The same is applied with software.
Also AI models do not respect software licenses any more than they do artistic licenses. Which is definitely a problem
@feliks @Natanox @charadon @scottfgray
Derivative work is derivative work, the way it was derived is irrelevant
@feliks @Natanox @charadon @scottfgray
Any AI generated image for which a single CC-BY-SA was used to create the model needs to, according to the license, be tagged with the name of the original author, and be shared under CC-BY-SA. Copyleft exists for images too, so do intellectual property rights
@feliks @Natanox @charadon @scottfgray like I said before, mugging people gives you a very competitive advantage in society. So does threatening minorities. So does slavery. So does human trafficking. So does organized crime.
A system that can't exist without committing large scale intellectual property fraud should not exist.
@tocisz
this machine kills Al
é
LORENZO MONTATORE= "28 wah
% Artists Against Generative Al - Join
“© Danielle Sanfilippo - 13h -@
Posting this on behalf of a member who would like to remain anonymous:
I'm an art director and supervisor for a large studio. The studio heads had the bright idea
before I started to hire prompters. Several bros were brought onto the film project. I
absolutely hated myself for not quitting on the spot but stuck with it because it’s
mercenary out there. Have a family to feed etc. I decided to use this time wisely. Treat
them as I would any artist I had hired. First round of pictures of a sweeping Ariel forest
landscape comes through and it’s not bad. They submit a ton of work and one or two of
the 40 are ok. Nearly on brief. So first round feedback goes through and I tell them about
the perspective mistakes, colour changes I want, layers that any matte painting would be
split into. Within a day I get 5 variants. Not changes to the ones I wanted but variations.
Again. Benefit of the doubt I give them another round of feedback making it clear. Next day
it’s worse. I sit there and patiently paint over, even explaining the steps I would take as a
painter. They don’t do it, anomalies start appearing when I say I want to keep the exact
image but with changes. They can’t. They simply don’t have the eye to see the basic
mistakes so the Ai starts to over compensate. We get people starting to appear in the
images. These are obviously holiday snaps.
“Remove the people”
“What would you like them changed to?”
“... grass. I just don’t want them there”
They can’t do it. The one that can actually use photoshop hasn't developed the eye to see
his mistakes, ends up getting angry at me for not understanding he can’t make specific
changes. The girl whose background was a little photography has given me 40
progressively worse images with wilder mistakes every time. This is 4 days into the project.
I'm both pissed about the waste, but elated seeing ai fall at the first hurdle. It’s not even
that the images are unusable, the people making them have no eye for what's wrong, no
thicker skin for constructive criticism and feedback, no basic artistic training in perspective
and functionality in what they’re making.
Yes the hype is going to pump more money into this. They won't go anywhere for a while.
But this has been such a glowing perfect moment of watching the fundamental part fail in
the face of the most simple tasks. All were fired and the company no longer accepts Ai
prompters as applicants. Your training as an artist will always be the most important part of
this process and it is invaluable. I hope this post gives you a boost in a dark time.
@scottfgray Here's the full text from original source:
Posting this on behalf of a member who would like to remain anonymous:
I’m an art director and supervisor for a large studio. The studio heads had the bright idea before I started to hire prompters. Several bros were brought onto the film project. I absolutely hated myself for not quitting on the spot but stuck with it because it’s mercenary out there. Have a family to feed etc. I decided to use this time wisely. Treat them as I would any artist I had hired. First round of pictures of a sweeping Ariel forest landscape comes through and it’s not bad. They submit a ton of work and one or two of the 40 are ok. Nearly on brief. So first round feedback goes through and I tell them about the perspective mistakes, colour changes I want, layers that any matte painting would be split into. Within a day I get 5 variants. Not changes to the ones I wanted but variations. Again. Benefit of the doubt I give them another round of feedback making it clear. Next day it’s worse. I sit there and patiently paint over, even explaining the steps I would take as a painter. They don’t do it, anomalies start appearing when I say I want to keep the exact image but with changes. They can’t. They simply don’t have the eye to see the basic mistakes so the Ai starts to over compensate. We get people starting to appear in the images. These are obviously holiday snaps.
“Remove the people”
“What would you like them changed to?”
“… grass. I just don’t want them there”
They can’t do it. The one that can actually use photoshop hasn’t developed the eye to see his mistakes, ends up getting angry at me for not understanding he can’t make specific changes. The girl whose background was a little photography has given me 40 progressively worse images with wilder mistakes every time. This is 4 days into the project.
I’m both pissed about the waste, but elated seeing ai fall at the first hurdle. It’s not even that the images are unusable, the people making them have no eye for what’s wrong, no thicker skin for constructive criticism and feedback, no basic artistic training in perspective and functionality in what they’re making.
Yes the hype is going to pump more money into this. They won’t go anywhere for a while. But this has been such a glowing perfect moment of watching the fundamental part fail in the face of the most simple tasks. All were fired and the company no longer accepts Ai prompters as applicants. Your training as an artist will always be the most important part of this process and it is invaluable. I hope this post gives you a boost in a dark time.
@scottfgray As an EE who has been told for >20 years that PCB designers will be soon obsolete because auto-routers will do our job faster and better.... Well, I'm still waiting.
Sure, generative AI has made things possible that we didn't think computer could possibly do in our lifetimes. But there is a big difference between generating A picture and generating The picture the customer wanted.
@scottfgray The generic genericizer can't handle specific demands.
Who would have thunk?
Posting this on behalf of a member who would like to remain anonymous:
I’m an art director and supervisor for a large studio. The studio heads had the bright idea before I started to hire prompters. Several bros were brought onto the film project. I absolutely hated myself for not quitting on the spot but stuck with it because it’s mercenary out there. Have a family to feed etc. I decided to use this time wisely. Treat them as I would any artist I had hired. First round of pictures of a sweeping Ariel forest landscape comes through and it’s not bad. They submit a ton of work and one or two of the 40 are ok. Nearly on brief. So first round feedback goes through and I tell them about the perspective mistakes, colour changes I want, layers that any matte painting would be split into. Within a day I get 5 variants. Not changes to the ones I wanted but variations. Again. Benefit of the doubt I give them another round of feedback making it clear. Next day it’s worse. I sit there and patiently paint over, even explaining the steps I would take as a painter. They don’t do it, anomalies start appearing when I say I want to keep the exact image but with changes. They can’t. They simply don’t have the eye to see the basic mistakes so the Ai starts to over compensate. We get people starting to appear in the images. These are obviously holiday snaps.
“Remove the people”
“What would you like them changed to?”
“… grass. I just don’t want them there”
They can’t do it. The one that can actually use photoshop hasn’t developed the eye to see his mistakes, ends up getting angry at me for not understanding he can’t make specific changes. The girl whose background was a little photography has given me 40 progressively worse images with wilder mistakes every time. This is 4 days into the project.
I’m both pissed about the waste, but elated seeing ai fall at the first hurdle. It’s not even that the images are unusable, the people making them have no eye for what’s wrong, no thicker skin for constructive criticism and feedback, no basic artistic training in perspective and functionality in what they’re making.
Yes the hype is going to pump more money into this. They won’t go anywhere for a while. But this has been such a glowing perfect moment of watching the fundamental part fail in the face of the most simple tasks. All were fired and the company no longer accepts Ai prompters as applicants. Your training as an artist will always be the most important part of this process and it is invaluable. I hope this post gives you a boost in a dark time.
@crocodisle @Antiroo @scottfgray it’s really annoying that I always liked high-effort, supe detailed anime art portraits and JUST started learning how to make them sort of look like that — boom, imitative AI to make everyone suspicious of it.
Guess I have to learn stylised low-detail (but still technically very skilled and crafted) cartoon style. Which would be fine if that’s what I actually want to be able to make.
@MxVerda @Antiroo @scottfgray I think there's still space for high detail anime-style pieces. How it gets shared becomes more prickly for sure. Perhaps sharing process videos or sketches would give watchers the benefit of the doubt.
I never considered that in our lifetimes we'd have such a bombshell to contend with when it comes to finding out what's real or not online. Sorry to hear it's had such a negative effect for you!
@crocodisle @Antiroo @scottfgray ah, nw. I never made money from it and I’ve got friends I can show it to anyway.
I heard those process videos are / will be used for training the next round of imitative AI, so yay.
I appreciate your positivity tho. It feels nice online 😽
@scottfgray I was in a conversation a couple of days ago where a manager expressed "You'd be surprised at how much resistance there is among developers to using Copilot. I guess it's a fear that it's going to take their jobs".
My guy, we just don't want something _else_ making mistakes we'll have to clean up. I can do that on my own.
@scottfgray I'll never understand how "AI prompter" is an actual job now… how did this many people fall for this con… like, it's not even elaborate
It's fun watching capitalist pigs eat shit though. Happy meal y'all
AI may have value in the hands of artists who understand the field and still have all the other skills necessary for the work. It will be another tool in their already well-stocked toolbox.
Thinking this new tool can replace expertise and all other tools is stupid.
Yep, I realize this super quick when messing with local install of an image generator. Fancy quick pictures but good luck trying to get a super specific quick change on that and still holding the rest. Unless one has a high skill of photoshop bashing.
Big reason I am like, nah, I go back to just drawing by hand. Plus, I got bored so quick with messing with any of those generators. Plus, I find far more enjoyment in exploring and improving my style by practice.