Thanks, Tawtovo, for reminding me.

Here is the Washington Posts's roundup.

https://s2.washingtonpost.com/camp-rw/?trackId=5986a242ae7e8a68160e418f&s=661309655c61b95eb9ff40e0&linknum=2&linktot=50

When they go beyond the facts, they make very safe assessments and predictions.

They're also obviously trying to keep the tone calm. They even say as much.

1/

The Trump Trials: Cannon brawl

The latest news in Donald Trump’s four criminal cases, and what to watch for this week as the New York hush money trial looms.

Someone mentioned that the jury selection in New York will be lit.

I would imagine every New Yorker wants to be on that jury.

Completely personal observation:
Trump was lucky to draw 1 (of many) sympathetic judge. When I practiced in California it seemed like almost all judges were sympathetic to the prosecution and hostile to the defense. Most judges were former prosecutors. Some seemed eager to help the prosecution.

In high profile cases they usually try to look good.

2/

@Teri_Kanefield it’s common for jury selection to take a long time in high profile trials like this, no? I’m thinking of selection in Young Thug’s RICO trial in Georgia taking months and months. That’s probably an outlier, but still.