@peteorrall @hl @xdydx Not that I'm aware of. It looks more like there are plans to remove the (now pretty much useless) SMBv1 client implementation entirely from #FreeBSD, see the manpage (which recommends one of these #fuse-based ports instead ... maybe that improved since I last tried):

https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=smbfs&apropos=0&sektion=5&manpath=FreeBSD+14.0-RELEASE&arch=default&format=html

smbfs(5)

@zirias @peteorrall @hl @xdydx
FYI: There are plans to implement smb/cifs 2 or above on #FreeBSD, maybe difficult and lower priority, though.

https://wiki.freebsd.org/EnterpriseWorkingGroup

EnterpriseWorkingGroup - FreeBSD Wiki

@TomAoki @peteorrall @hl @xdydx I'm surprised ... I didn't expect this to come up in the "enterprise" realm, "just" using kerberized #NFSv4 instead should be pretty fine there and it's probably more the #soho environment that will profit most from some up-to-date #smb client in #FreeBSD 😎 ... but would certainly be very nice to get that!

Also interesting they finally want to move to #MIT #krb5 in base. I'll probably continue to build it from ports, so I can use #LibreSSL instead of #OpenSSL, but still nice, as I found you're e.g. forced to use base #kerberos with the NFS client.