Feeding #Threads trash into #Mastodon is the functional equivalent of when Tom Sawyer got the other kids to whitewash the fence for him for free. Only in this case Tom is Zuckerberg and his cohorts, laughing at the "Fediverse" rubes.
@lauren I'm not sure I understand the objection. Why should I care, as a reader, what platform someone I follow uses to post, or, as a poster, what platform someone who wants to follow me reads me on?
@mattblaze That you don't understand is why Zuck and friends are getting such a laugh.
@lauren Yes, you're right. I don't understand. I'm not trying to be difficult. I honestly don't understand!

@mattblaze @lauren

Does it help if someone reminds you these are platforms run by Nazi sympathizers and other varieties of fascist?

Or are you being deliberately obtuse?

@f800gecko @lauren Should I conclude you don't have any way of explaining without being deliberately insulting?

I'm sure I'm missing something. But I'm not stupid in general. So what am I missing?

@mattblaze
You're just missing some ideological fear and hatred, which Facebook has accumulated not undeservedly.
@f800gecko @lauren
@kolya @mattblaze @f800gecko Or to put it another way, why would ANYONE trust Meta given their history?
@kolya @f800gecko @lauren I get that there are ample reasons to mistrust Facebook (which is why I don't personally use it). But I don't see how this is different from any other federated site run by sketchy entities (of which there are already plenty).
@mattblaze @kolya @f800gecko Please name the federated sites operating on a significant for-profit basis. Not talking about just trying to cover costs plus a bit. I mean ads, the whole works. Like Meta.

@lauren @kolya @f800gecko I don't know. I don't keep track of them. But I know there are federated sites run by a variety of entities, many with policies and ideologies I disagree with. And mostly, I don't notice. I don't see how this is different.

I'm not trying to be difficult. At two of your followers have called me stupid for not seeing something obvious here. But I really don't see the cause for alarm here.

@mattblaze @kolya @f800gecko Well, I haven't called you stupid. I might suggest you are being a bit naive on this particular issue, but nobody's perfect.
@lauren
So still no argument?
@mattblaze @f800gecko
@kolya @mattblaze @f800gecko Say what? See my detailed replies. Of course, Mastodon probably isn't showing them to you since its reply thread mechanism is so bizarre.
@lauren
How would ads be different to the spam and other bad content we already have? Why wouldn't we able to deal with it the same way we do now? @mattblaze @f800gecko
@mattblaze
Yes, I don't either. I heard some fears of embrace and extinguish tactics, ie FB might extend the protocol with proprietary features etc, but I don't see that working out realistically with ActivityPub being a @w3c standard.
@f800gecko @lauren
@mattblaze @kolya @f800gecko @lauren well yes but we usually block those. Meta is an exceptionally bad actor and must be treated with great caution. See https://erinkissane.com/untangling-threads