franco_vazzaDo you think it is legitimate to call for an open dialogue between sprituality and science?
Yes (I am a scientist)
No (I am a scientist)
Yes (I am not a scientist)
No (I am not a scientist)
Poll ended at .
Klaus Alexander Seistrup@franco_vazza
I this context, does “science” mean “physicalism” (»we think that elementary particles and electromagnetic radiation are the fuldamental building blocks of the universe, and consciousness is an emergent property of these«)?
In that case, a guy like Bernardo Kastrup has already expertly opened the dance floor and asked physicalism and “spirituality” out for a dance.
https://www.bernardokastrup.com/
#AnalyticIdealism
#BernardoKastrup
#physicalism
#science
#spirituality
I this context, does “science” mean “physicalism” (»we think that elementary particles and electromagnetic radiation are the fuldamental building blocks of the universe, and consciousness is an emergent property of these«)?
In that case, a guy like Bernardo Kastrup has already expertly opened the dance floor and asked physicalism and “spirituality” out for a dance.
https://www.bernardokastrup.com/
#AnalyticIdealism
#BernardoKastrup
#physicalism
#science
#spirituality
@kas as other noticed, we can debate the details of what modern science exactly is, but it should be much harder to decide what spirituality actually is. That’s already an important starting point of this discussion.